首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Why Does Advice Discounting Occur? The Combined Roles of Confidence and Trust
【2h】

Why Does Advice Discounting Occur? The Combined Roles of Confidence and Trust

机译:为什么会出现咨询折扣?信任与信任的共同作用

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Judges tend to discount the opinions of others even though advice is often helpful in improving their accuracy. The present research proposes that this phenomenon of advice discounting results from the judges’ confidence in their initial decision and little trust in advice. Furthermore, the degree of advice discounting may be predicted by the combined roles of confidence and trust. Three studies provide evidence for these hypotheses. Participants were very confident in their initial estimation and had little trust in the advice (study 1). The degree of advice discounting decreased when participants felt less confidence in performing difficult tasks compared with easy tasks (study 2) or when participants placed more trust in advice because the advice was from an expert rather than from a novice (study 3). In addition, confidence and trust predicted the degree of advice discounting across three studies. These findings shed new light on the mechanism underlying advice discounting and advice taking by indicating the combined roles of confidence and trust.
机译:法官倾向于轻视他人的意见,尽管建议通常有助于提高他们的准确性。本研究建议,这种意见折衷现象是由于法官对最初决定的信心和对意见的不信任造成的。此外,建议打折的程度可以通过信心和信任的结合作用来预测。三项研究为这些假设提供了证据。参与者对他们的初步估计非常有信心,对建议的信任度不高(研究1)。与简单任务相比,当参与者对执行困难任务的信心降低时(研究2),或者当参与者对建议的信任度更高时,由于建议来自专家而不是新手,建议折扣率降低了(研究3)。此外,信心和信任预测了三项研究中建议折价的程度。这些发现通过表明信心和信任的共同作用,为建议折扣和建议采纳的潜在机制提供了新的思路。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号