首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Abstract emotional and concrete concepts and the activation of mouth-hand effectors
【2h】

Abstract emotional and concrete concepts and the activation of mouth-hand effectors

机译:抽象的情感的和具体的概念以及口型效应器的激活

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

According to embodied and grounded theories, concepts are grounded in sensorimotor systems. The majority of evidence supporting these views concerns concepts referring to objects or actions, while evidence on abstract concepts is more scarce. Explaining how abstract concepts such as “freedom” are represented would thus be pivotal for grounded theories. According to some recent proposals, abstract concepts are grounded in both sensorimotor and linguistic experience, thus they activate the mouth motor system more than concrete concepts. Two experiments are reported, aimed at verifying whether abstract, concrete and emotional words activate the mouth and the hand effectors. In both experiments participants performed first a lexical decision, then a recognition task. In Experiment 1 participants responded by pressing a button either with the mouth or with the hand, in Experiment 2 responses were given with the foot, while a button held either in the mouth or in the hand was used to respond to catch-trials. Abstract words were slower to process in both tasks (concreteness effect). Across the tasks and experiments, emotional concepts had instead a fluctuating pattern, different from those of both concrete and abstract concepts, suggesting that they cannot be considered as a subset of abstract concepts. The interaction between type of concept (abstract, concrete and emotional) and effector (mouth, hand) was not significant in the lexical decision task, likely because it emerged only with tasks implying a deeper processing level. It reached significance, instead, in the recognition tasks. In both experiments abstract concepts were facilitated in the mouth condition compared to the hand condition, supporting our main prediction. Emotional concepts instead had a more variable pattern. Overall, our findings indicate that various kinds of concepts differently activate the mouth and hand effectors, but they also suggest that concepts activate effectors in a flexible and task-dependent way.
机译:根据具体和扎根的理论,概念扎根于感觉运动系统中。支持这些观点的大多数证据都涉及到涉及对象或动作的概念,而有关抽象概念的证据则更为匮乏。因此,解释如何表示抽象概念(例如“自由”)对于扎根的理论至关重要。根据最近的一些建议,抽象概念植根于感觉运动和语言经验,因此它们比具体概念更能激活口腔运动系统。据报道,有两个实验旨在验证抽象,具体和情感的话语是否能激活嘴巴和手部效应器。在两个实验中,参与者首先执行词汇决策,然后执行识别任务。在实验1中,参与者通过用嘴或手按下按钮来做出响应,在实验2中,用脚做出响应,而用嘴或手中保持的按钮来响应抓捕。在两个任务中抽象词的处理都较慢(具体效果)。在任务和实验中,情感概念的波动模式与具体概念和抽象概念不同,这表明它们不能被视为抽象概念的子集。概念类型(抽象,具体和情感)和效应器(嘴,手)之间的相互作用在词汇决策任务中并不重要,可能是因为它仅在暗示更深层次处理任务的情况下出现。相反,它在识别任务中具有重要意义。在两个实验中,与手部状态相比,在口部状态下都简化了抽象概念,支持了我们的主要预测。相反,情感概念具有更多可变的模式。总体而言,我们的发现表明,各种概念可以不同程度地激活口腔和手部效应器,但是它们也表明,这些概念以灵活且依赖于任务的方式来激活效应器。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号