首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >The ankle brachial index exhibits better association with cardiovascular outcomes than interarm systolic blood pressure difference in patients with type 2 diabetes
【2h】

The ankle brachial index exhibits better association with cardiovascular outcomes than interarm systolic blood pressure difference in patients with type 2 diabetes

机译:与2型糖尿病患者的臂间收缩压差相比踝臂指数与心血管预后相关性更好

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Increased interarm systolic blood pressure difference (IASBPD) is associated with cardiovascular prognosis in the general population. This study aimed to evaluate whether IASBPD or ankle brachial index (ABI) is strongly associated with cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes.Total 446 type 2 diabetes followed up for a mean 5.8 years divided by ABI (<0.9 vs ≥0.9) or IASBPD (<10 vs ≥10 mm Hg). The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause mortality, hospitalization for coronary artery disease, nonfatal stroke, carotid, or peripheral revascularization, amputations, and diabetic foot syndrome. The secondary endpoint was all-cause mortality.Sixty-four composite events and 17 deaths were identified. The primary and secondary outcomes were higher than those in the group with ABI < 0.9 vs ABI ≥ 0.9 (32.8% vs 11.6%, P < .005 for primary outcome; 14.0% vs 2.3%, P < .005 for all-cause mortality) but IASBPD cannot exhibit a prognostic value. ABI < 0.9 was also the dominant risk factor of both endpoints demonstrated by multivariate Cox proportional analysis (composite events: adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 2.39; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.26–4.53; P = .007; all-cause mortality: adjusted HR, 3.27: 95% CI, 1.91–5.60; P < .001).The ABI was more associated with cardiovascular outcomes in patients with diabetes than IASBPD.
机译:普通人群的臂间收缩压差(IASBPD)升高与心血管预后相关。这项研究旨在评估IASBPD或踝臂指数(ABI)是否与2型糖尿病患者的心血管结局密切相关。对446名2型糖尿病进行了平均5.8年的随访,平均随访时间为5.8年除以ABI(<0.9 vs≥0.9)或IASBPD(<10 vs≥10mm Hg)。主要结果是所有原因的死亡率,冠状动脉疾病,非致命性中风,颈动脉或外周血运重建,截肢和糖尿病足综合征的住院治疗的综合结果。次要终点是全因死亡率。确定了64例复合事件和17例死亡。主要和次要结局指标均高于ABI <0.9和ABI≥0.9组(主要结局指标分别为32.8%vs 11.6%,P <0.005;全因死亡率14.0%vs 2.3%,P <0.005)。 ),但IASBPD无法显示预后价值。多变量Cox比例分析显示,ABI <0.9也是两个终点的主要危险因素(复合事件:调整后的危险比[HR]为2.39; 95%置信区间[CI]为1.26-4.53; P = .007;所有原因死亡率:校正后的HR,3.27:95%CI,1.91-5.60; P <.001)。与IASBPD相比,糖尿病患者的ABI与心血管结局的相关性更高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号