首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Mode of Action of Microbial Biological Control Agents Against Plant Diseases: Relevance Beyond Efficacy
【2h】

Mode of Action of Microbial Biological Control Agents Against Plant Diseases: Relevance Beyond Efficacy

机译:微生物生物防治剂对植物病害的作用方式:功效之外的相关性

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Microbial biological control agents (MBCAs) are applied to crops for biological control of plant pathogens where they act via a range of modes of action. Some MBCAs interact with plants by inducing resistance or priming plants without any direct interaction with the targeted pathogen. Other MBCAs act via nutrient competition or other mechanisms modulating the growth conditions for the pathogen. Antagonists acting through hyperparasitism and antibiosis are directly interfering with the pathogen. Such interactions are highly regulated cascades of metabolic events, often combining different modes of action. Compounds involved such as signaling compounds, enzymes and other interfering metabolites are produced in situ at low concentrations during interaction. The potential of microorganisms to produce such a compound in vitro does not necessarily correlate with their in situ antagonism. Understanding the mode of action of MBCAs is essential to achieve optimum disease control. Also understanding the mode of action is important to be able to characterize possible risks for humans or the environment and risks for resistance development against the MBCA. Preferences for certain modes of action for an envisaged application of a MBCA also have impact on the screening methods used to select new microbials. Screening of MBCAs in bioassays on plants or plant tissues has the advantage that MBCAs with multiple modes of action and their combinations potentially can be detected whereas simplified assays on nutrient media strongly bias the selection toward in vitro production of antimicrobial metabolites which may not be responsible for in situ antagonism. Risks assessments for MBCAs are relevant if they contain antimicrobial metabolites at effective concentration in the product. However, in most cases antimicrobial metabolites are produced by antagonists directly on the spot where the targeted organism is harmful. Such ubiquitous metabolites involved in natural, complex, highly regulated interactions between microbial cells and/or plants are not relevant for risk assessments. Currently, risks of microbial metabolites involved in antagonistic modes of action are often assessed similar to assessments of single molecule fungicides. The nature of the mode of action of antagonists requires a rethinking of data requirements for the registration of MBCAs.
机译:微生物生物防治剂(MBCA)应用于作物,用于通过各种作用方式起作用的植物病原体的生物防治。一些MBCA通过诱导抗性或引发植物而与植物相互作用,而与目标病原体没有任何直接相互作用。其他MBCA通过营养物质竞争或其他机制调节病原体的生长条件。通过高寄生和抗生作用起作用的拮抗剂直接干扰病原体。此类相互作用是代谢事件的高度调控级联,通常结合不同的作用方式。涉及的化合物(例如信号传导化合物,酶和其他干扰代谢物)在相互作用期间以低浓度原位产生。微生物在体外产生这种化合物的潜力不一定与其原位拮抗作用有关。了解MBCA的作用方式对于实现最佳疾病控制至关重要。同样重要的是,要了解行动模式,对于能够描述可能对人类或环境造成的风险以及对MBCA产生抵抗力的风险也很重要。对于MBCA的预期应用,某些作用方式的偏好也会影响用于选择新微生物的筛选方法。在植物或植物组织的生物测定中筛选MBCA的优势在于,可以检测到具有多种作用方式及其组合的MBCA,而在营养培养基上进行的简化测定则强烈地将选择偏向于可能不负责体外产生抗微生物代谢物原位拮抗作用。如果MBCA中含有有效浓度的抗菌代谢产物,则它们的风险评估是有意义的。但是,在大多数情况下,拮抗剂直接在目标生物有害的部位产生抗微生物代谢产物。这种参与微生物细胞和/或植物之间自然,复杂,高度调控的相互作用的普遍存在的代谢物与风险评估无关。当前,通常以类似于单分子杀真菌剂的评估来评估参与拮抗作用方式的微生物代谢产物的风险。拮抗剂作用方式的性质需要重新考虑MBCA注册的数据要求。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号