首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>other >Trend of salvage treatment in diffuse large B cell lymphoma in the outpatient chemotherapy era
【2h】

Trend of salvage treatment in diffuse large B cell lymphoma in the outpatient chemotherapy era

机译:门诊化疗时代弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤抢救治疗的趋势

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) who have failed to achieve complete remission with first-line therapy can subsequently receive salvage therapy. However, there is no definite consensus on the use of salvage therapy, and little information on the optimal treatment regimen. The present study retrospectively analyzed data from 131 patients diagnosed with DLBCL between April 2002 and November 2017 who relapsed and received salvage therapy. Primary treatment included R-CHOP or R-CHOP-like regimens. The most common salvage regimen was R-DeVIC (42%), followed by R-ESHAP (23%), other aggressive regimens (12%) and palliative therapy (23%). The median overall survival (OS) was 45.7 months for R-DeVIC, 41.8 months for palliative therapy, 29.4 months for R-ESHAP, and 28.5 months for aggressive regimens (P=0.937). A total of 25 patients underwent autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), and the OS was 75.6 months for these patients compared with 33.5 months (range, 25.6–45.6 months) for patients who did not undergo ASCT (P=0.033). Following the establishment of an outpatient chemotherapy unit in 2014, R-DeVIC use became more common, increasing from 37% prior to 2014 to 46% after 2014, whereas R-ESHAP use decreased (31 to 17%). The present study did not identify the optimal salvage regimen for patients with DLBCL. However, salvage ASCT improved the outcome, and regimens administered via peripheral veins were demonstrated to be more common in outpatient chemotherapy settings.
机译:一线治疗未能完全缓解的弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)患者可随后接受挽救治疗。但是,对于挽救疗法的使用尚无明确共识,关于最佳治疗方案的信息也很少。本研究回顾性分析了2002年4月至2017年11月间131例诊断为DLBCL并复发并接受挽救疗法的患者的数据。主要治疗包括R-CHOP或R-CHOP样疗法。最常见的抢救方案是R-DeVIC(42%),其次是R-ESHAP(23%),其他积极方案(12%)和姑息疗法(23%)。 R-DeVIC的中位总生存期(OS)为45.7个月,姑息治疗为41.8个月,R-ESHAP为29.4个月,积极治疗为28.5个月(P = 0.937)。共有25例患者接受了自体干细胞移植(ASCT),这些患者的OS为75.6个月,而未接受ASCT的患者的OS为33.5个月(范围25.6–45.6个月)(P = 0.033)。在2014年建立门诊化疗单元后,R-DeVIC的使用变得越来越普遍,从2014年之前的37%增加到2014年之后的46%,而R-ESHAP的使用减少了(31%至17%)。本研究尚未确定DLBCL患者的最佳挽救方案。然而,抢救性ASCT改善了结局,并且经门静脉给药的方案在门诊化疗中更常见。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号