首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine : eCAM >A Double-Blind Randomized Crossover Comparative Study for Evaluating the Clinical Safety of Ephedrine Alkaloids-Free Ephedra Herb Extract (EFE)
【2h】

A Double-Blind Randomized Crossover Comparative Study for Evaluating the Clinical Safety of Ephedrine Alkaloids-Free Ephedra Herb Extract (EFE)

机译:一项双盲随机交叉比较研究用于评估无麻黄碱的麻黄中草药提取物(EFE)的临床安全性

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Ephedra Herb is an important crude drug; it is used in various Traditional Japanese Medicine (Kampo) formulations. Its significant pharmacological effects have been believed to be attributed to ephedrine and pseudoephedrine, which sometimes induce adverse effects. On the other hand, it has been reported that some of these pharmacological effects are not dependent on ephedrine or pseudoephedrine. Ephedrine alkaloids-free Ephedra Herb extract has been newly developed. It has been reported to have analgesic, anti-influenza, and antimetastatic effects. This clinical trial was aimed at verifying the noninferiority of EFE's safety compared to that of Ephedra Herb extract (EHE) in humans. This was a single-institution, double-blinded, randomized, two-drug, two-stage, crossover comparative study. Twelve healthy male subjects were equally and randomly allocated into two groups: prior administration of EFE (EFE-P) and prior administration of EHE (EHE-P). In Stage 1, EFE and EHE were orally administered to the EFE-P and EHE-P groups, respectively, for six days. After a 4-week washout period, Stage 2 was initiated wherein the subjects were given a study drug different from Stage 1 study drug for six days. Eleven adverse events with a causal relationship to the study drugs (EHE: 8; EFE: 3) were noted; all events were mild in severity. With regard to the incidence of adverse events, EHE and EFE administration, respectively, accounted for 4 cases (out of 12 subjects, similarly below) and 1 case of increased pulse rate (p=0.32) and 3 cases and 1 case of insomnia (p=0.59). Further, there was one case of hot flashes (p=1.00) due to EFE administration and one case of dysuria (p=1.00) due to EHE administration. There were no significant differences in the incidences of adverse events between EHE administration and EFE administration. Therefore, we concluded that EFE is not inferior to EHE in terms of safety.
机译:麻黄药草是重要的原料药。它可用于各种传统日药(Kampo)配方中。据信其重要的药理作用归因于麻黄碱和伪麻黄碱,它们有时会引起不良反应。另一方面,据报道,这些药理作用中的一些不依赖麻黄碱或伪麻黄碱。不含麻黄碱的生物碱麻黄提取物已得到新开发。据报道具有止痛,抗流感和抗转移作用。这项临床试验旨在验证与人麻黄提取物(EHE)相比,EFE安全性的非劣效性。这是一项单机构,双盲,随机,两药,两阶段,交叉研究。将十二位健康的男性受试者随机分为两类:预先服用EFE(EFE-P)和预先服用EHE(EHE-P)。在第1阶段,将EFE和EHE分别口服给予EFE-P和EHE-P组六天。在4周的清除期后,开始阶段2,其中向受试者给予与阶段1研究药物不同的研究药物六天。注意到与研究药物有因果关系的11种不良事件(EHE:8; EFE:3);所有事件的严重程度均为轻度。就不良事件的发生率而言,EHE和EFE分别占4例(在12名受试者中,下同)和1例脉搏增加(p = 0.32),3例和1例失眠( p = 0.59)。此外,有1例因EFE引起的潮热(p = 1.00)和1例因EHE引起的排尿困难(p = 1.00)。 EHE给药和EFE给药之间不良事件的发生率无显着差异。因此,我们得出结论,就安全性而言,EFE不逊于EHE。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号