首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics >Impact of different CBCT imaging monitor units reconstruction slice thicknesses and planning CT slice thicknesses on the positioning accuracy of a MV‐CBCT system in head‐and‐neck patients
【2h】

Impact of different CBCT imaging monitor units reconstruction slice thicknesses and planning CT slice thicknesses on the positioning accuracy of a MV‐CBCT system in head‐and‐neck patients

机译:不同的CBCT成像监视单元重建切片厚度以及计划的CT切片厚度对MV-CBCT系统在头颈部患者中定位精度的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of different CBCT imaging monitor units (MUs), reconstruction slice thicknesses, and planning CT slice thicknesses on the positioning accuracy of a megavoltage cone‐beam computed tomography (MV‐CBCT) system in image‐guided radiation therapy (IGRT) in head‐and‐neck patients. The MV‐CBCT system was a Siemens MVision, a commercial system integrated into the Siemens ONCOR linear accelerator. The positioning accuracy of the MV‐CBCT system was determined using an anthropomorphic phantom while varying the MV‐CBCT imaging MU, reconstruction slice thickness, and planning CT slice thickness. A total of 240 CBCT images from six head‐and‐neck patients who underwent intensity‐modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) treatment were acquired and reconstructed using different MV‐CBCT scanning protocols. The interfractional setup errors of the patients were retrospectively analyzed for different imaging MUs, reconstruction slice thicknesses, and planning CT slice thicknesses. Using the anthropomorphic phantom, the largest measured mean deviation component and standard deviation of the MVision in 3D directions were 1.3 and 1.0 mm, respectively, for different CBCT imaging MUs, reconstruction slice thicknesses, and planning CT slice thicknesses. The largest setup group system error (M), system error (∑), and random error (σ) from six head‐and‐neck patients were 0.6, 1.2, and 1.7 mm, respectively. No significant difference was found in the positioning accuracy of the MV‐CBCT system between the 5 and 8 MUs, and between the 1 and 3 mm reconstruction slice thicknesses. A thin planning CT slice thickness may achieve higher positioning precision using the phantom measurement, but no significant difference was found in clinical setup precision between the 1 and 3 mm planning CT slice thicknesses.PACS number: 87.55 ne
机译:这项研究的目的是研究不同CBCT成像监控器(MU),重建切片厚度以及计划CT切片厚度对兆伏锥束计算机断层扫描(MV-CBCT)系统在图像中的定位精度的影响-头颈部患者的导向放射治疗(IGRT)。 MV-CBCT系统是Siemens MVision,它是集成到Siemens ONCOR线性加速器中的商用系统。 MV-CBCT系统的定位精度是使用拟人模型来确定的,同时改变了MV-CBCT成像MU,重建切片厚度和计划CT切片厚度。使用不同的MV-CBCT扫描方案,从六位接受了调强放疗(IMRT)治疗的头颈患者中获取并重建了240张CBCT图像。对于不同的成像MU,重建切片厚度和计划CT切片厚度,回顾性分析了患者的分数设置误差。使用拟人模型,对于不同的CBCT成像MU,重建切片厚度和计划CT切片厚度,MVision在3D方向上测得的最大平均偏差分量和标准偏差分别为1.3和1.0 mm。来自六个头颈部患者的最大设置组系统误差(M),系统误差(∑)和随机误差(σ)分别为0.6、1.2和1.7 mm。 MV-CBCT系统的定位精度在5到8个MU之间以及1-3毫米重建切片厚度之间没有发现显着差异。较薄的计划CT切片厚度可以通过幻影测量获得更高的定位精度,但是在1毫米和3毫米计划CT切片厚度之间在临床设置精度上没有发现显着差异.PACS编号:87.55 ne

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号