首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Schizophrenia Bulletin >Thinking About the Future Cognitive Remediation Therapy—What Works and Could We Do Better?
【2h】

Thinking About the Future Cognitive Remediation Therapy—What Works and Could We Do Better?

机译:思考未来的认知疗法–什么可行我们能做得更好?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This article reviews progress in the development of effective cognitive remediation therapy (CRT) and its translational process. There is now enough evidence that cognitive difficulties experienced by people with schizophrenia can change and that the agenda for the next generation of studies is to increase these effects systematically through cognitive remediation. We examine the necessary steps and challenges of moving CRT to treatment dissemination. Theories which have been designed to explain the effects of cognitive remediation, are important but we conclude that they are not essential for dissemination which could progress in an empirical fashion. One apparent barrier is that cognitive remediation therapies look different on the surface. However, they still tend to use many of the same training procedures. The only important marker for outcome identified in the current studies seems to be the training emphasis. Some therapies concentrate on massed practice of cognitive functions, whereas others also use direct training of strategies. These may produce differing effects as noted in the most recent meta-analyses. We recommend attention to several critical issues in the next generation of empirical studies. These include developing more complex models of the therapy effects that take into account participant characteristics, specific and broad cognitive outcomes, the study design, as well as the specific and nonspecific effects of treatment, which have rarely been investigated in this empirical programme.
机译:本文回顾了有效的认知补救疗法(CRT)的发展及其转化过程。现在有足够的证据表明,精神分裂症患者所经历的认知困难可以改变,并且下一代研究的议程是通过认知修复系统地增加这些影响。我们研究了将CRT应用于治疗传播的必要步骤和挑战。旨在解释认知补救作用的理论虽然很重要,但我们得出的结论是,它们对于以经验形式发展的传播不是必不可少的。一个明显的障碍是认知补救疗法在表面上看起来有所不同。但是,他们仍然倾向于使用许多相同的培训程序。当前研究中确定的唯一重要结局指标似乎是培训重点。一些疗法专注于认知功能的大规模实践,而另一些疗法也使用策略的直接训练。如最近的荟萃分析中所述,这些可能会产生不同的效果。我们建议在下一代实证研究中注意几个关键问题。这些措施包括建立更复杂的治疗效果模型,其中要考虑参与者的特征,具体和广泛的认知结果,研究设计以及具体和非具体的治疗效果,而在此经验计划中很少对此进行研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号