首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Ecology and Evolution >Heterogeneous microcommunities and ecosystem multifunctionality in seminatural grasslands under three management modes
【2h】

Heterogeneous microcommunities and ecosystem multifunctionality in seminatural grasslands under three management modes

机译:三种管理模式下半天然草原的异质微群落和生态系统多功能性

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Increasing attention has been paid to the relationship between biodiversity and ecosystem functioning (BEF) because of the rapid increase in species loss. However, over the past 20 years, most BEF studies only focused on the effect of species diversity on one or a few ecosystem functions, and only a few studies focused on ecosystem multifunctionality (i.e., the simultaneous provision of several ecosystem functions). Grassland ecosystems have important economic, environmental, and esthetic value; thus, this study focused on the heterogeneous microcommunities in grasslands under three management modes. The multifunctionality index (M‐index) was assessed at community and microcommunity scales, and the relationship between species diversity and multifunctionality was investigated. The communities were found to be respectively composed of one, three, and six microcommunities in grazing, clipping, and enclosure management, based on a two‐way indicator species analysis (TWINSPAN) and detrended correspondence analysis (DCA) for community structure. Biodiversity and soil indicators showed an apparent degradation of the grazing community, which had the worst M‐index. Clipping and enclosure communities showed no significant difference in biodiversity indices, soil variables, and M‐index; however, these indices were clearly different among microcommunities. Therefore, the microcommunity scale may be suitable to investigate the relationship between vegetation and multifunctionality in seminatural grassland ecosystems. Dominant species richness had more explanatory power for ecosystem multifunctionality than subdominant species richness, rare species richness, and the number of all species. Therefore, it is important to distinguish the role and rank of different species in the species richness–multifunctionality model; otherwise, the model might include redundant and unclear information. Communities with more codominant species whose distribution is also even might have better multifunctionality.
机译:由于物种丧失的迅速增加,生物多样性与生态系统功能(BEF)之间的关系越来越受到关注。但是,在过去的20年中,大多数BEF研究仅关注物种多样性对一种或几种生态系统功能的影响,而只有少数研究关注生态系统的多功能性(即同时提供几种生态系统功能)。草原生态系统具有重要的经济,环境和审美价值。因此,本研究着眼于三种管理模式下草地的异质性微社区。在社区和微观社区规模上评估了多功能指数(M-index),并研究了物种多样性与多功能性之间的关系。根据针对社区结构的双向指标物种分析(TWINSPAN)和去趋势对应分析(DCA),发现这些社区在放牧,修剪和围栏管理中分别由一个,三个和六个微型社区组成。生物多样性和土壤指标显示出放牧群落的明显退化,其M指数最差。剪枝和围栏群落在生物多样性指数,土壤变量和M-指数上没有显着差异。但是,这些指数在微型社区之间明显不同。因此,微群落规模可能适合研究半天然草原生态系统中植被与多功能性之间的关系。优势物种丰富度对生态系统多功能性的解释力要高于优势物种丰富度,稀有物种丰富度和所有物种的数量。因此,重要的是要区分物种多样性和多功能性模型中不同物种的作用和等级。否则,该模型可能包含冗余且不清楚的信息。具有更占优势的物种分布的社区甚至可能具有更好的多功能性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号