首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Perspectives on Medical Education >Ensuring the quality of multiple-choice exams administered to small cohorts: A cautionary tale
【2h】

Ensuring the quality of multiple-choice exams administered to small cohorts: A cautionary tale

机译:确保对小型队列进行的多项选择考试的质量:警告的故事

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

IntroductionMultiple-choice questions (MCQs) are a cornerstone of assessment in medical education. Monitoring item properties (difficulty and discrimination) are important means of investigating examination quality. However, most item property guidelines were developed for use on large cohorts of examinees; little empirical work has investigated the suitability of applying guidelines to item difficulty and discrimination coefficients estimated for small cohorts, such as those in medical education. We investigated the extent to which item properties vary across multiple clerkship cohorts to better understand the appropriateness of using such guidelines with small cohorts.
机译:简介多项选择题(MCQs)是医学教育评估的基石。监视项目属性(困难和歧视)是检查考试质量的重要手段。但是,大多数项目属性指南是为在大量应试者中使用而开发的;很少有经验研究调查将指导原则应用于小队列(如医学教育中)的项目难度和辨别系数的适用性。我们调查了多个文员队列中项目属性的变化程度,以更好地了解对小型队列使用此类准则的适当性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号