A comparative study of immediate wound healing complications following cleft lip repair using either absorbable or non-absorbable skin sutures

机译：使用可吸收或不可吸收皮肤缝线修复唇裂后立即伤口愈合并发症的比较研究

代理获取

本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务，本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文，但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁，仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况，如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

页面导航

摘要
著录项
相似文献
相关主题

摘要

ObjectivesThe aim of the study was to compare wound healing complications following the use of either absorbable or non-absorbable sutures for skin closure in cleft lip repair.

机译：目的本研究的目的是比较使用可吸收或不可吸收缝线缝合唇裂修复伤口愈合后的并发症。

著录项

期刊名称 Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons
作者
Akeem O. Alawode; Michael O. Adeyemi; Olutayo James; Mobolanle O. Ogunlewe; Azeez Butali; Wasiu L. Adeyemo;
展开▼
作者单位

展开▼
年(卷),期 2018(44),4
年度 2018
页码 159–166
总页数 8
原文格式 PDF
正文语种
中图分类口腔科;牙科材料学;
关键词
Wound healing Orofacial cleft Absorbable Non-absorbable Sutures;

机译：伤口愈合;面颊裂;可吸收;不可吸收;缝合线;
入库时间 2022-08-17 11:52:08

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. COMPARISON OF NON-ABSORBABLE SUTURE (PROLENE) WITH ABSORBABLE SUTURE (VICRYL) IN TERMS OF WOUND COMPLICATIONS AND COSMESIS. [J] . Bushra Sayeed, Khiaynat Sarwar Hashmi, Shehzad Ahmad Qamar The Professional Medical Journal . 2019,第5期

机译：伤口并发症和合并的术语中，不可吸收的缝合线（轮廓）与可吸收的缝合线（乙烯基）的比较。
2. A double-blinded randomised controlled trial – do subcuticular non-absorbable skin sutures have a better aesthetic outcome than skin staples in large wound closures? [J] . Joshua Agilinko, Poh Tan GMS Interdisciplinary Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery DGPW . 2019,第1期

机译：双盲随机对照试验 - Dococuticular不可吸收的皮肤缝线是否具有更好的审美结果，而不是大伤口闭合的皮肤钉？
3. Repair of cleft lip and simultaneous repair of cleft hard palate with vomer flap in unilateral complete cleft lip and palate: a comparative study. [J] . Ferdous KM, Salek AJ, Islam MK, Pediatric surgery international . 2010,第10期

机译：比较研究单侧完全性唇裂和唇裂的修复与唇裂同时修复硬hard裂。
4. Comparative study between silk suture and metallic Staplers in skin wound closure in Rabbits [C] . Zainab B. Abdulkareem, Luay A. Naeem, Mohammed M. Jassim International Scientific Conference on Pure Sciences, Brilliant Creativity and Renewed Building . 2019

机译：兔皮肤伤口闭合丝缝合和金属吻合器的比较研究
5. Evaluation of the Effects of Two Dressing Materials: Absorbable Collagen Wound Dressings (HeliCOTERTM) and Oxidized Regenerated Cellulose (SurgicelRTM) on Wound Healing at the Palatal Donor Site after Free Gingival Graft Surgery: A Pilot Study. [D] . Sun, Teresa Chanting. 2015

机译：两种敷料材料的效果评估：可吸收性胶原伤口敷料（HeliCOTERTM）和氧化再生纤维素（SurgicelRTM）对免费牙龈移植手术后Pala骨供体部位伤口愈合的作用：一项先导研究。
6. A double-blinded randomised controlled trial – do subcuticular non-absorbable skin sutures have a better aesthetic outcome than skin staples in large wound closures? [O] . Joshua Agilinko, Poh Tan 2019

机译：一项双盲随机对照试验–在大伤口闭合中皮下不可吸收的皮肤缝合线是否比皮肤缝合钉具有更好的美学效果？
7. A comparative study of inguinal hernia using monofilament non-absorbable suture versus monofilament absorbable suture in Lichtenstein tension free hernia repair at tertiary care government hospital [O] . Karan R. Patel, Adeesh P. Jain, Sarav C. Shah, 2019

机译：用单丝不可吸收缝合对腹腹疝的对比研究，在第三级护理医院中利森斯坦张力疝修复中的单丝吸收缝合

A comparative study of immediate wound healing complications following cleft lip repair using either absorbable or non-absorbable skin sutures

摘要

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅