首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>European Journal of Population = Revue Europenne de Dmographie >Agreement of Self-Reported and Administrative Data on Employment Histories in a German Cohort Study: A Sequence Analysis
【2h】

Agreement of Self-Reported and Administrative Data on Employment Histories in a German Cohort Study: A Sequence Analysis

机译:一项德国队列研究中关于就业历史的自我报告和行政数据的一致性:序列分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Collecting life course data is increasingly common in social and epidemiological research, either through record linkage of administrative data or by collecting retrospective interview data. This paper uses data on employment histories collected through both strategies, compares the attained samples, and investigates levels of agreements of individual histories. We use data from the German Heinz Nixdorf Recall Study with information on employment histories collected retrospectively from 2011 until 2014 (N = 3059). Administrative data from the German Institute for Employment Research (IAB) were linked to the survey data. After comparing respondents who provide self-reported histories with the subsample of the ones for which administrative data were available, we investigate the agreement of individual employment histories from the two sources (between 1975 and 2010) using sequence analyses. Almost all participants provided survey data on employment histories (97% of the sample), linkage consent was given by 93%, and administrative data were available for 63% of the participants. People with survey data were more likely to be female, to have a higher education, and to work self-employed and in the tertiary sector. The agreement of individual employment histories is high and similar across time, with a median level of agreement of 89%. Slightly lower values exist for women and people working in the tertiary sector, both having more complex histories. No differences exist for health-related factors. In conclusion, it is likely that missing consent and failed record linkage lead to sample differences; yet, both strategies provide comparable and reliable life course data.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1007/s10680-018-9476-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
机译:通过行政数据的记录链接或通过回顾性访谈数据,收集生命历程数据在社会和流行病学研究中越来越普遍。本文使用通过两种策略收集的就业历史数据,比较获得的样本,并研究各个历史的协议水平。我们使用来自德国亨氏Nixdorf召回研究的数据以及2011年至2014年间回顾性收集的就业历史信息(N = 593059)。来自德国就业研究所(IAB)的行政数据已与调查数据关联。在将提供自我报告历史的受访者与可获得行政数据的子样本进行比较之后,我们使用顺序分析调查了两种来源(1975年至2010年)的个人就业历史的一致性。几乎所有参与者都提供了有关就业历史的调查数据(占样本的97%),有93%的人表示同意联系,而63%的参与者可获得行政数据。拥有调查数据的人更有可能是女性,受过高等教育,自营职业和第三产业。个人就业历史的一致性在各个时间段内都很高且相似,中位数一致性水平为89%。对于具有较复杂历史的第三产业中的妇女和妇女而言,价值略低。健康相关因素没有差异。总之,缺少同意和失败的记录链接可能导致样本差异。电子补充材料本文的在线版本(10.1007 / s10680-018-9476-2)包含补充材料,授权用户可以使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号