首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Human Kinetics >Analysis of the Association Between Motor and Anthropometric Variables with Change of Direction Speed and Reactive Agility Performance
【2h】

Analysis of the Association Between Motor and Anthropometric Variables with Change of Direction Speed and Reactive Agility Performance

机译:运动与人体测量学变量之间的关联以及方向速度变化和反应敏捷性的分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

There is an evident lack of studies examining the factors associated with reactive agility performances. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between anthropometrics, body composition, jumping capacity, reactive strength, and balance with a stop-and-go change of direction speed (CODS) and reactive agility. The total sample comprised 39 male (body height: 182.95 ± 5.19 cm; body mass: 80.66 ± 7.69 kg) and 34 female (body height: 171.45 ± 6.81 cm; body mass: 61.95 ± 6.70 kg) college-level athletes (21.9 ± 1.9 years of age). The variables included body height, body mass, the percentage of body fat (BF%), balance as measured by an overall-stability index, the countermovement jump (CMJ), a reactive-strength index (RSI), stop-and-go reactive agility, and stop-and-go CODS. To define the associations between motor and anthropometric variables with CODS and reactive agility, the participants were clustered into three achievement groups based on their CODS and reactive agility performances. The ANOVA showed a significant difference between the CODS-based achievement groups for the CMJ (F test = 3.45 and 3.60 for males and females, respectively; p < 0.05), the RSI (F test = 6.94 and 5.29 for males and females, respectively; p < 0.05), and balance (F test = 3.47; p < 0.05 for males). In females, the reactive agility achievement groups differed significantly in the RSI (F test = 6.46; p < 0.05), the CMJ (F test = 4.35; p < 0.05) and BF% (F test = 4.07; p < 0.05), which is further confirmed by discriminant canonical analysis (Can R = 0.74; p < 0.05). The results confirm the need for independent evaluation and training for both CODS and reactive agility performance in sports.
机译:显然缺乏研究检查与反应敏捷性表现相关的因素的研究。这项研究的目的是评估人体测量学,身体成分,跳跃能力,反应强度以及平衡与方向速度的不断变化(CODS)和反应敏捷性之间的关联。样本总数为39位男性(体重:182.95±5.19 cm;体重:80.66±7.69 kg)和34位女性(体重:171.45±6.81 cm;体重:61.95±6.70 kg)大学水平的运动员(21.9± 1.9岁)。这些变量包括身高,体重,体脂百分比(BF%),通过整体稳定性指标测量的平衡,反向运动跳跃(CMJ),反应强度指数(RSI),走走停停反应性敏捷性和即停即用的CODS。为了定义运动变量和人体测量变量与CODS和反应敏捷性之间的关联,根据参与者的CODS和反应敏捷性表现将他们分为三个成就组。方差分析显示,基于CODS的CMJ成就组之间的差异显着(男性和女性分别为F检验= 3.45和3.60; p <0.05),RSI(男性和女性分别为F检验= 6.94和5.29) ; p <0.05)和平衡(F检验= 3.47;男性p <0.05)。在女性中,反应敏捷实现组在RSI(F测试= 6.46; p <0.05),CMJ(F测试= 4.35; p <0.05)和BF%(F测试= 4.07; p <0.05)方面有显着差异,判别典范分析进一步证实了这一点(Can R = 0.74; p <0.05)。结果证实,需要对运动中的CODS和反应敏捷性表现进行独立评估和培训。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号