首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Market Access Health Policy >A comparison of HAS NICE guidelines for the economic evaluation of health technologies in the context of their respective national health care systems and cultural environments
【2h】

A comparison of HAS NICE guidelines for the economic evaluation of health technologies in the context of their respective national health care systems and cultural environments

机译:比较HAS和NICE在各自国家卫生保健系统和文化环境下对卫生技术进行经济评估的指南

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundHealth technology assessment (HTA) has been reinforced in France, notably with the introduction of economic evaluation in the pricing process for the most innovative and expensive treatments. Similarly to the National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) in England, the National Authority for Health (HAS), which is responsible for economic evaluation of new health technologies in France, has published recommendations on the methods of economic evaluation. Since economic assessment represents a major element of HTA in England, exploring the differences between these methodological guidelines might help to comprehend both the shape and the role economic assessment is intended to have in the French health care system.
机译:背景技术法国已经加强了健康技术评估(HTA),特别是在定价过程中引入了最具创新性和最昂贵疗法的经济评估。与英国国家临床卓越研究所(NICE)相似,负责法国新卫生技术经济评估的国家卫生总局(HAS)也发布了有关经济评估方法的建议。由于经济评估是英国HTA的主要内容,因此探索这些方法指南之间的差异可能有助于理解经济评估在法国医疗体系中的形状和作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号