首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Scientific Reports >Size-Exclusion Chromatography-based isolation minimally alters Extracellular Vesicles’ characteristics compared to precipitating agents
【2h】

Size-Exclusion Chromatography-based isolation minimally alters Extracellular Vesicles’ characteristics compared to precipitating agents

机译:与沉淀剂相比基于尺寸排阻色谱法的分离最小程度地改变了细胞外囊泡的特性

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Extracellular vesicles (EVs) have become an attractive field among the scientific community. Yet, a major challenge is to define a consensus method for EVs isolation. Ultracentrifugation has been the most widely used methodology but rapid methods, including Size Exclusion Chromatography (SEC) and/or precipitating agents such as Polyethylene glycol (PEG) or PRotein Organic Solvent PRecipitation (PROSPR) have emerged. To evaluate the impact of these different methods on the resulting EV preparations, plasma EVs were isolated using SEC, PEG and PROSPR, and their total protein content, NTA and Cryo-electron microscopy profiles, and EV-markers were compared. Also, their effect on recipient cells was tested. Low protein content and Cryo-EM analysis showed that SEC removed most of the overabundant soluble plasma proteins, which were not removed using PEG and partially by PROSPR. Moreover, only SEC allowed the detection of the EV-markers CD9, CD63 and CD81, LGALS3BP and CD5L, suggesting a putative interference of the precipitating agents in the structure/composition of the EVs. Furthermore, PEG and PROSPR-based EV isolation resulted in reduced cell viability in vitro. These results stress that appropriate EV-isolation method should be considered depending on the forthcoming application of the purified EVs.
机译:细胞外囊泡(EVs)已成为科学界的一个有吸引力的领域。然而,主要的挑战是为电动汽车隔离定义一种共识方法。超速离心是使用最广泛的方法,但是已经出现了快速方法,包括尺寸排阻色谱(SEC)和/或沉淀剂,例如聚乙二醇(PEG)或PRotein有机溶剂沉淀(PROSPR)。为了评估这些不同方法对所得EV制剂的影响,使用SEC,PEG和PROSPR分离了血浆EV,并比较了它们的总蛋白含量,NTA和冷冻电子显微镜谱以及EV标记。同样,测试了它们对受体细胞的作用。低蛋白含量和Cryo-EM分析表明,SEC去除了大部分过剩的可溶性血浆蛋白,而使用PEG并不能通过PROSPR去除这些蛋白。此外,只有SEC允许检测EV标记CD9,CD63和CD81,LGALS3BP和CD5L,这表明沉淀剂可能会干扰EV的结构/组成。此外,基于PEG和PROSPR的EV分离导致体外细胞活力降低。这些结果强调,应根据即将提纯的纯电动汽车的应用,考虑采用适当的电动汽车隔离方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号