首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Scientific Reports >Assessment of local treatment modalities for FIGO stage IB-IIB cervical cancer: A propensity-score matched analysis based on SEER database
【2h】

Assessment of local treatment modalities for FIGO stage IB-IIB cervical cancer: A propensity-score matched analysis based on SEER database

机译:FIGO IB-IIB期宫颈癌的局部治疗方式评估:基于SEER数据库的倾向评分匹配分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of local treatment modalities on the survival of patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IB-IIB cervical cancer, including cancer-directed surgery (CDS) alone and CDS combined with radiotherapy (RT). A total of 8,357 patients with cervical cancer between 1988 and 2013 were included in the final study cohort, including 4,298 (51.4%) patients who underwent CDS alone and 4,059 (48.6%) patients who received combination therapy. Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that local treatment modalities were prognostic factors for cause-specific survival (CSS). Patients who received combination therapy had worse CSS (HR = 1.38; 95% CI = 1.20–1.59; P < 0.001). Subgroup analyses showed the prognostic effect of local treatment modalities was significantly influenced by FIGO stage. In the propensity-score matched (PSM) dataset, CDS was associated with better CSS (P < 0.001) for patients with IB-IIA cervical cancer; nevertheless, no differences were observed in CSS (P = 0.639) for patients with IIB cervical cancer. In conclusion, radical surgery was the preferred treatment for patients with IB-IIA cervical cancer, and there was no difference between radical surgery alone and combination therapy for patients with IIB cervical cancer.
机译:这项研究的目的是研究局部治疗方式对国际妇产科联合会(FIGO)IB-IIB期宫颈癌患者生存的影响,包括单独的癌症定向手术(CDS)和CDS联合放射治疗(RT)。在最终研究队列中纳入了1988年至2013年之间的8,357例宫颈癌患者,其中4,298例(51.4%)单独接受CDS的患者和4,059例(48.6%)接受联合治疗的患者。单因素和多因素分析表明,局部治疗方式是特定原因生存(CSS)的预后因素。接受联合治疗的患者的CSS较差(HR = 1.38; 95%CI = 1.20-1.59; P <0.001)。亚组分析显示,局部治疗方式的预后效果受到FIGO分期的显着影响。在倾向评分匹配(PSM)数据集中,对于IB-IIA宫颈癌患者,CDS与更好的CSS相关(P <0.001)。然而,IIB宫颈癌患者的CSS差异无统计学意义(P = 0.639)。总之,根治性手术是IB-IIA宫颈癌患者的首选治疗方法,而单纯根治性手术和IIB宫颈癌患者的联合治疗之间没有区别。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号