首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Oncology Letters >Comparison between the clinical efficacy of platelet concentrates derived from buffy coat and apheresis in tumor patients
【2h】

Comparison between the clinical efficacy of platelet concentrates derived from buffy coat and apheresis in tumor patients

机译:血沉棕黄层和单采血液分离血小板浓缩物在肿瘤患者中的临床疗效比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy between manual buffy coat-derived platelet concentrates (PCs) and automated apheresis platelet concentrates (APCs) in terms of their therapeutic effects. The corrected count increment (CCI) was calculated according to detected differences in platelet concentration in patients who underwent transfusion of APCs, prepared by an automated system (group I, 72 cases) or PCs derived from buffy coat by manual method (group II, 83 cases). The clinical efficacy was assessed in terms of the CCI and clinical symptoms. The platelet contents of all the PCs were detected before transfusion. The mean 1 h CCI was 13.56±4.45 and 24 h CCI was 8.67±4.21 in group I, while the mean 1 h CCI was 15.83±4.65 and 24 h CCI was 9.57±3.36 in group II. The effective rates judged by CCI for groups I and II were 53 and 64%, respectively, and those judged by clinical symptoms were 67 and 60%, respectively. In conclusion, the clinical effectiveness of manual PCs was similar to that for APCs; thus, it could be utilized for clinical use.
机译:本研究的目的是评估手工血沉棕黄层衍生的血小板浓缩物(PC)和自动单采血液分离血小板浓缩物(APC)之间的临床疗效。根据通过自动系统(I组,72例)或通过手工方法从血沉棕黄层中提取的PC(A组,83组)输注APC的患者中检测到的血小板浓度差异,计算校正后的计数增量(CCI)。情况)。根据CCI和临床症状评估临床疗效。输血前检测所有PC的血小板含量。 I组平均1 h CCI为13.56±4.45,24 h CCI为8.67±4.21,II组平均1 h CCI为15.83±4.65,24 h CCI为9.57±3.36。由CCI判断的I组和II组的有效率分别为53%和64%,而根据临床症状判断的有效率分别为67%和60%。总之,手动PC的临床效果与APC相似。因此,可以用于临床。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号