...
首页> 外文期刊>Oncology letters >Comparison between the clinical efficacy of platelet concentrates, derived from buffy coat and apheresis in tumor patients
【24h】

Comparison between the clinical efficacy of platelet concentrates, derived from buffy coat and apheresis in tumor patients

机译:血小板浓缩物的临床疗效比较,衍生自肿瘤患者的柔软涂层和分离物

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy between manual buffy coat-derived platelet concentrates (PCs) and automated apheresis platelet concentrates (APCs) in terms of their therapeutic effects. The corrected count increment (CCI) was calculated according to detected differences in platelet concentration in patients who underwent transfusion of APCs, prepared by an automated system (group I, 72 cases) or PCs derived from buffy coat by manual method (group II, 83 cases). The clinical efficacy was assessed in terms of the CCI and clinical symptoms. The platelet contents of all the PCs were detected before transfusion. The mean 1 h CCI was 13.56 +/- 4.45 and 24 h CCI was 8.67 +/- 4.21 in group I, while the mean 1 h CCI was 15.83 +/- 4.65 and 24 h CCI was 9.57 +/- 3.36 in group II. The effective rates judged by CCI for groups I and II were 53 and 64%, respectively, and those judged by clinical symptoms were 67 and 60%, respectively. In conclusion, the clinical effectiveness of manual PCs was similar to that for APCs; thus, it could be utilized for clinical use.
机译:本研究的目的是在其治疗效果方面评估手动血糖衍生的血小板浓缩物(PCS)和自动血小板血小板浓缩物(APC)之间的临床疗效。根据经历APC的患者的血小板浓度的检测到差异计算,通过手动方法(第II族第II族,83组案例)。在CCI和临床症状方面评估了临床疗效。在输血前检测到所有PC的血小板内容。平均1小时CCI是13.56 +/- 4.45和24小时CCI在I组中为8.67 +/- 4.21,而平均1小时CCI为15.83 +/- 4.65和24小时CCI是II组中的9.57 +/- 3.36 。 CCI对I和II组判断的有效率分别为53和64%,临床症状判断的那些分别为67%和60%。总之,手动PCS的临床效果与APC的临床效果类似;因此,它可以用于临床使用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号