首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Oncology Letters >BRAFV600E mutation is not associated with central lymph node metastasis in all patients with papillary thyroid cancer: Different histological subtypes and preoperative lymph node status should be taken into account
【2h】

BRAFV600E mutation is not associated with central lymph node metastasis in all patients with papillary thyroid cancer: Different histological subtypes and preoperative lymph node status should be taken into account

机译:在所有甲状腺乳头状癌患者中BRAFV600E突变与中央淋巴结转移并不相关:应考虑不同的组织学亚型和术前淋巴结状况

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The association between central lymph node metastasis (LNM) and risk factors, including the presence of the BRAF mutation, BRAFV600E, in patients with papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) requires further investigation. A potent risk factor that can indicate LNM in different histological subtypes of PTC and in different preoperative central lymph node statuses also requires further research. A total of 287 patients with PTC who accepted thyroidectomy were included in the present study. Clinicopathological data of these patients were reviewed to examine the risk factors for central LNM through univariate and multivariate analyses. Overall, BRAFV600E in patients with cN0 (subclinical nodal disease) and cN1 (other than cN0) PTC was associated with central LNM. However, multivariate analyses demonstrated that BRAFV600E was not an independent risk factor in patients with cN1 or cN0 PTC. For patients with classical variant PTC (CVPTC), BRAFV600E was independently associated with central LNM. However, on further analysis, the association was only significant in patients with cN0 CVPTC. For patients with follicular variant PTC (FVPTC) or aggressive variant PTC (AVPTC), the BRAFV600E mutation rate was not significantly different between patients with and without central LNM. In conclusion, BRAFV600E was an independent risk factor for central LNM overall in patients with PTC and in patients with CVPTC, particularly in patients with cN0 CVPTC. However, BRAFV600E was not an independent risk factor for patients with FVPTC and AVPTC. Therefore, BRAFV600E provides varied clinical significance in different histological subtypes and preoperative central lymph node status.
机译:甲状腺乳头状癌(PTC)患者的中央淋巴结转移(LNM)与危险因素(包括BRAF突变,BRAF V600E )的存在之间的关联需要进一步研究。可以在PTC的不同组织学亚型和术前不同的中央淋巴结状态中指示LNM的潜在危险因素也需要进一步研究。本研究共纳入287例接受甲状腺切除术的PTC患者。回顾了这些患者的临床病理数据,以通过单因素和多因素分析来检查中心性LNM的危险因素。总体而言,患有cN0(亚临床淋巴结性疾病)和cN1(cN0除外)PTC的患者的BRAF V600E 与中央LNM相关。但是,多因素分析表明,BRAF V600E 不是cN1或cN0 PTC患者的独立危险因素。对于患有经典变异PTC(CVPTC)的患者,BRAF V600E 与中央LNM独立相关。但是,在进一步分析中,该关联仅在cN0 CVPTC患者中显着。对于有滤泡变异型PTC(FVPTC)或侵袭性变异型PTC(AVPTC)的患者,BRAF V600E 突变率在有和无中心LNM的患者之间无显着差异。总之,BRAF V600E 是PTC患者和CVPTC患者,特别是cN0 CVPTC患者的整体LNM的独立危险因素。但是,BRAF V600E 不是FVPTC和AVPTC患者的独立危险因素。因此,BRAF V600E 在不同的组织学亚型和术前中央淋巴结状态方面具有不同的临床意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号