首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Oncology Letters >Comparison of the 8th union for international cancer control lymph node staging system for gastric cancer with two other lymph node staging systems
【2h】

Comparison of the 8th union for international cancer control lymph node staging system for gastric cancer with two other lymph node staging systems

机译:第八届国际胃癌癌控制淋巴结分期系统与其他两个淋巴结分期系统的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS) and the metastatic lymph node ratio (MLR) staging systems have previously been demonstrated to exhibit advantages compared with the tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging system in predicting the prognosis of gastric cancer. The current study compared the prognostic significance of the newest Union for International Cancer Control Node classification with the LODDS and MLR staging systems. From September 2010 to December 2012, all medical records for patients with gastric cancer at the Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University were retrospectively analyzed and the clinicopathologic characteristics were reviewed. Cut-off points were selected to divide the patients with gastric cancer into different groups. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify the prognostic risk factors for gastric cancer. The Harrell's concordance index (C-index) was adopted to compare the prognostic value of the three staging systems. A total of 877 patients with gastric cancer who met the inclusion criteria were analyzed in the current study. The patients were classified according to the three MLR subgroups as follows: MLR0 (MLR=0), MLR1 (0<MLR≤0.28) and MLR2 (0.28<MLR<1). The patients were classified according to the LODDS subgroups as follows: LODDS1 (LODDS≤-0.5), LODDS2 (−0.5<LODDS≤0), LODDS3 (0<LODDS≤0.5) and LODDS4 (LODDS>0.5). Based on multivariate analysis, LODDS, MLR and pathological node (pN) stage could significantly predict survival rates of patients with gastric cancer. According to the C-index, the LODDS staging system more accurately predicted the 5-year overall survival for patients with gastric cancer compared with the other two staging systems. In summary, the current study has identified that LODDS may be superior to the MLR and pN staging systems in predicting the prognosis of patients with gastric cancer. However MLR may exhibit advantages compared with LODDS for patients who have undergone adequate lymphadenectomies.
机译:先前已证明阳性淋巴结(LODDS)和转移性淋巴结比率(MLR)分期系统的对数赔率在预测胃癌的预后方面与肿瘤淋巴结转移(TNM)分期系统相比显示出优势。当前的研究将最新的国际癌症控制节点分类联盟与LODDS和MLR分期系统的预后意义进行了比较。从2010年9月至2012年12月,对苏州大学第三附属医院胃癌患者的所有病历进行回顾性分析,并对临床病理特征进行回顾。选择临界点将胃癌患者分为不同的组。进行单因素和多因素分析以鉴定胃癌的预后危险因素。采用Harrell一致性指数(C-index)来比较这三个分期系统的预后价值。在本研究中,总共对符合入选标准的877例胃癌患者进行了分析。根据三个MLR亚组将患者分类如下:MLR0(MLR = 0),MLR1(0 0.5)。基于多变量分析,LODDS,MLR和病理节点(pN)阶段可以显着预测胃癌患者的生存率。根据C指数,LODDS分期系统比其他两个分期系统更准确地预测了胃癌患者的5年总生存期。总而言之,当前的研究已经确定,LODDS在预测胃癌患者的预后方面可能优于MLR和pN分期系统。但是,对于经过充分淋巴结切除术的患者,MLD可能比LODDS更具优势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号