首页> 外文期刊>Surgery >Comparison of the staging of regional lymph nodes using the sixth and seventh editions of the tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) classification system for the evaluation of overall survival in gastric cancer patients: Findings of a case-control analysis involving a single institution in China
【24h】

Comparison of the staging of regional lymph nodes using the sixth and seventh editions of the tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) classification system for the evaluation of overall survival in gastric cancer patients: Findings of a case-control analysis involving a single institution in China

机译:使用第六版和第七版肿瘤淋巴结转移(TNM)分类系统评估胃癌患者总体生存率的区域淋巴结分期的比较:涉及中国一家机构的病例对照分析结果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Background It has recently been reported that the sixth edition of the tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) classification system for gastric cancer involving the staging of regional lymph nodes (N) has inappropriate cut-offs with regard to counts of metastatic lymph nodes. It remains controversial, however, as to whether the seventh edition of this classification system is completely accurate in staging N for the prediction of the prognosis of gastric cancer. Our aim was to determine which of these two editions of the TNM classification system was superior with regard to the prediction of the prognosis of Chinese patients with gastric cancer. Methods We analyzed relevant clinicopathological data statistically from 1,563 patients with gastric cancer who had undergone curative resection to evaluate the sixth and seventh editions of the TNM classification system for N staging with regard to the prediction of overall survival (OS). Results Our survival analyses demonstrated that N staging via use of both the sixth and seventh editions of the TNM classification system was correlated with OS. Furthermore, case-control analysis indicated that the seventh edition was significantly superior to the sixth edition in predicting the OS of patients, regardless of the extent of lymphadenectomy (D1 or D2) and the number of dissected lymph nodes (<16 or ≥16). By taking into consideration both the extent of lymphadenectomy and the number of dissected lymph nodes simultaneously, we determined that the seventh edition of the TNM classification system was superior to the sixth edition regarding the evaluation of the OS in the various subgroups of gastric cancer patients. Conclusion The seventh edition proved more reliable and accurate than the sixth edition of the TNM classification system in categorizing the number of metastatic lymph nodes for the purpose of predicting the OS of patients with gastric cancer after curative resection.
机译:背景技术最近有报道说,涉及局部淋巴结分期(N)的胃癌肿瘤淋巴结转移(TNM)分类系统的第六版在转移淋巴结计数方面有不适当的界限。然而,关于该分类系统的第七版在分期N预测胃癌预后方面是否完全准确仍存在争议。我们的目的是确定在预测中国胃癌患者预后方面,这两个版本的TNM分类系统中哪个版本更好。方法我们对1563例行根治性切除术的胃癌患者的相关临床病理数据进行统计学分析,以评估TNM分类系统第六版和第七版的N分期,以预测整体生存率(OS)。结果我们的生存分析表明,通过使用TNM分类系统的第六版和第七版进行的N分期与OS相关。此外,病例对照分析表明,无论淋巴结清扫术的范围(D1或D2)和解剖的淋巴结数目(<16或≥16)如何,第七版在预测患者的OS方面均明显优于第六版。 。通过同时考虑淋巴结清扫术的范围和解剖的淋巴结数目,我们确定就胃癌患者各亚组的OS评估而言,TNM分类系统的第七版优于第六版。结论在对转移性淋巴结的数目进行分类以预测治愈性胃癌患者OS的目的上,第七版比TNM分类系统更可靠,更准确。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号