首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>SpringerPlus >Spontaneous adverse drug reaction reporting by patients in Canada: a multi-method study—study protocol
【2h】

Spontaneous adverse drug reaction reporting by patients in Canada: a multi-method study—study protocol

机译:加拿大患者自发的不良药物不良反应报告:一项多方法研究方案

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background Monitoring adverse drug reactions (ADRs) through pharmacovigilance are vital to patient safety. Spontaneous ADR reporting is one method of pharmacovigilance, and in Canada all reporter types admitted to report an ADR to the Canadian Vigilance Program at Health Canada. Reports are submitted to Health Canada by post, telephone, or via the internet. The Canada Vigilance Program electronically records submitted information to detect medication safety alerts. Although previous studies have shown differences between patients and healthcare professionals (HCPs) on the types of drugs and reactions reported, relatively little is known about the importance of patient reports to pharmacovigilance activities. This article proposed a multi-method approach to evaluate the importance of patient ADR reporting on pharmacovigilance activities, by systematically review the available literature, comparing patient—versus HCPs-generated ADR reports that were submitted to the Canada Vigilance Program, and exploring patient views and experiences regarding the Canadian ADR reporting system.
机译:背景技术通过药物警戒监测药物不良反应(ADR)对患者安全至关重要。自发的ADR报告是药物警戒的一种方法,在加拿大,所有接受报告的报告者类型都向加拿大卫生部的加拿大警戒计划报告了ADR。通过邮寄,电话或通过互联网将报告提交给加拿大卫生部。加拿大警戒计划以电子方式记录提交的信息,以检测药物安全警报。尽管先前的研究表明患者和医护人员(HCP)在所报告的药物类型和反应方面存在差异,但对患者报告对药物警戒活动的重要性了解甚少。本文提出了一种多方法方法,通过系统地回顾现有文献,比较患者(与HCPs生成的ADR报告一起提交给加拿大警戒计划)以及探讨患者的观点和方法,来评估患者ADR报告对药物警戒活动的重要性。有关加拿大ADR报告系统的经验。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号