首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>SpringerPlus >Clinical utility of high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy for acute respiratory failure in patients with hematological disease
【2h】

Clinical utility of high-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy for acute respiratory failure in patients with hematological disease

机译:高流量鼻导管氧气疗法在血液系统疾病患者急性呼吸衰竭中的临床应用

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

A high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) is a newly developed device that enables high-flow oxygen therapy for patients with serious cardiopulmonary problems, but there are few data regarding its use in patients with hematological disease. The efficacy and tolerability of HFNCs for patients who developed ARF during the treatment of various hematological diseases was evaluated. Fifty-six patients underwent HFNC therapy during the last 2 years, and the causes of ARF were mainly pneumonia (n = 37) or acute congestive heart failure (n = 7). Only 11 patients (20 %) showed a good response to HFNC therapy, and remaining 45 patients (80 %) failed to respond to the initial HFNC therapy and, therefore, underwent second-line therapy including endotracheal intubation with mechanical ventilation (n = 15), non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (n = 1), or narcotic palliation alone (n = 29). Thus, HFNC appear not to be a viable treatment option in 4 out of 5 patients in this cohort of patients with hematological disease, but it was well tolerated in most patients (96 %); no major complications except for nasal soreness (n = 2) were observed. Multivariate analysis showed that the cause of ARF (pneumonia, odds ratio 11.2, 95 % CI 1.76–71.5, p = 0.01) was the only risk factor for treatment failure.
机译:高流量鼻插管(HFNC)是一种新开发的设备,可对患有严重心肺疾病的患者进行高流量氧气治疗,但有关在血液病患者中使用的数据很少。评估了HFNCs对各种血液系统疾病治疗期间发生ARF的患者的疗效和耐受性。在过去2年中对56例患者进行了HFNC治疗,ARF的病因主要是肺炎(n = 37)或急性充血性心力衰竭(n = 7)。只有11例患者(20%)对HFNC治疗表现良好,其余45例患者(80%)对初始HFNC治疗无效,因此接受了二线治疗,包括采用机械通气气管插管(n = 15) ),无创正压通气(n = 1)或仅麻醉性镇静(n = 29)。因此,在这个血液病患者队列中,HFNC似乎不是五分之四的患者的可行治疗选择,但在大多数患者中耐受性良好(96%);除鼻酸痛(n = 2)外,未观察到其他重大并发症。多元分析显示,ARF的病因(肺炎,比值比11.2、95%CI 1.76-71.5,p = 0.01)是治疗失败的唯一危险因素。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号