首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Telemedicine Journal and e-Health >A Systematic Review of the Evidence Base for Telehospice
【2h】

A Systematic Review of the Evidence Base for Telehospice

机译:对临终关怀的证据基础进行系统的审查

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The use of telehealth technologies to overcome the geographic distances in the delivery of hospice care has been termed telehospice. Although telehospice research has been conducted over the last 10 years, little is known about the comprehensive findings within the field. The purpose of this systematic article was to focus on available research and answer the question, What is the state of the evidence related to telehospice services? The article was limited to studies that had been published in the English language and indexed between January 1, 2000 and March 23, 2010. Indexed databases included PubMed and PsycINFO and contained specified key words. Only research published in peer review journals and reporting empirical data, rather than opinion or editorials, were included. A two-part scoring framework was modified and applied to assess the methodological rigor and pertinence of each study. Scoring criteria allowed the evaluation of both quantitative and qualitative methodologies. Twenty-six studies were identified with the search strategy. Although limited in number and in strength, studies have evaluated the use of a variety of technologies, attitudes toward use by providers and consumers, clinical outcomes, barriers, readiness, and cost. A small evidence base for telehospice has emerged over the last 10 years. Although the evidence is of medium strength, its pertinence is strong. The evidence base could be strengthened with randomized trials and additional clinical-outcome-focused research in larger randomized samples and in qualitative studies with better-described samples.
机译:使用远程医疗技术来克服临终关怀提供中的地理距离已被称为远程临终关怀。尽管远程临终关怀研究已进行了近十年,但对该领域的综合发现知之甚少。这篇系统文章的目的是关注现有研究并回答以下问题:与临终关怀服务相关的证据的状态如何?本文仅限于以英语发表的研究,在2000年1月1日至2010年3月23日之间建立了索引。建立索引的数据库包括PubMed和PsycINFO,并包含指定的关键词。只包括发表在同行评审期刊上并报告经验数据的研究,而不是观点或社论。修改了一个分为两部分的评分框架,并将其应用于评估每个研究的方法严谨性和相关性。计分标准可以评估定量和定性方法。搜寻策略确定了26项研究。尽管数量和强度受到限制,但研究评估了各种技术的使用,提供者和消费者使用的态度,临床结果,障碍,准备情况和成本。在过去的十年中,出现了一个小型的临终关怀证据库。尽管证据是中等强度的,但其针对性很强。可以通过更大的随机样本和描述更好的样本的定性研究,通过随机试验和其他针对临床结果的研究来加强证据基础。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号