首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Psychological Science >Modality and morphology: What we write may not be what we say
【2h】

Modality and morphology: What we write may not be what we say

机译:形态和形态:我们写的可能不是我们所说的

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Written language is an evolutionarily recent human invention whose neural substrates cannot, therefore, be determined by the genetic code. How, then, does the brain incorporate skills of this type? One possibility is that written language is parasitic on evolutionarily older skills such as spoken language, while another is that dedicated substrates develop with expertise. If written language is parasitic on spoken language, then acquired deficits of spoken and written language should necessarily co-occur. Alternatively, if there are at least some dedicated written language substrates, these deficits may (doubly) dissociate. We report on five individuals with aphasia, documenting a double dissociation in which the production of affixes (e.g., jumping) is disrupted in writing but not speaking, or vice versa. The findings reveal considerable independence of the written and spoken language systems in terms of morpho-orthographic operations. Understanding these properties of the adult orthographic system has implications for the education and rehabilitation of written language.
机译:书面语言是人类最近的进化发明,因此其神经底物无法通过遗传密码确定。那么,大脑如何整合这种技能呢?一种可能性是书面语言会寄生于诸如语音之类的进化上较老的技能,而另一种可能性是专门的底物会随着专业知识而发展。如果书面语言是口语中的寄生虫,那么必然会出现口语和书面语言的后天缺陷。或者,如果至少有一些专门的书面语言内容,则这些缺陷可能(双重)消失。我们报告了五位失语症患者,记录了双重解离,其中词缀(例如跳跃)的产生在书写中受到干扰,但没有说话,反之亦然。研究结果表明,书面语和口语系统在词法拼写操作方面具有相当大的独立性。理解成人拼字系统的这些特性对书面语言的教育和恢复有影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号