首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA >A novel method of adverse event detection can accurately identify venous thromboembolisms (VTEs) from narrative electronic health record data
【2h】

A novel method of adverse event detection can accurately identify venous thromboembolisms (VTEs) from narrative electronic health record data

机译:不良事件检测的新方法可以从叙述性电子病历数据中准确识别静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background Venous thromboembolisms (VTEs), which include deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE), are associated with significant mortality, morbidity, and cost in hospitalized patients. To evaluate the success of preventive measures, accurate and efficient methods for monitoring VTE rates are needed. Therefore, we sought to determine the accuracy of statistical natural language processing (NLP) for identifying DVT and PE from electronic health record data.>Methods We randomly sampled 2000 narrative radiology reports from patients with a suspected DVT/PE in Montreal (Canada) between 2008 and 2012. We manually identified DVT/PE within each report, which served as our reference standard. Using a bag-of-words approach, we trained 10 alternative support vector machine (SVM) models predicting DVT, and 10 predicting PE. SVM training and testing was performed with nested 10-fold cross-validation, and the average accuracy of each model was measured and compared.>Results On manual review, 324 (16.2%) reports were DVT-positive and 154 (7.7%) were PE-positive. The best DVT model achieved an average sensitivity of 0.80 (95% CI 0.76 to 0.85), specificity of 0.98 (98% CI 0.97 to 0.99), positive predictive value (PPV) of 0.89 (95% CI 0.85 to 0.93), and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.98 (95% CI 0.97 to 0.99). The best PE model achieved sensitivity of 0.79 (95% CI 0.73 to 0.85), specificity of 0.99 (95% CI 0.98 to 0.99), PPV of 0.84 (95% CI 0.75 to 0.92), and AUC of 0.99 (95% CI 0.98 to 1.00).>Conclusions Statistical NLP can accurately identify VTE from narrative radiology reports.
机译:>背景包括深静脉血栓形成(DVT)和肺栓塞(PE)在内的静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)与住院患者的显着死亡率,发病率和费用相关。为了评估预防措施是否成功,需要一种准确有效的方法来监测VTE率。因此,我们试图确定统计自然语言处理(NLP)从电子健康记录数据中识别DVT和PE的准确性。>方法我们随机抽取了2000名叙述性DVT / PE可疑患者的放射影像学报告我们在2008年至2012年期间在加拿大蒙特利尔进行了测试。我们在每份报告中手动标识了DVT / PE,这是我们的参考标准。使用词袋方法,我们训练了10个预测DVT的替代支持向量机(SVM)模型和10个预测PE的模型。通过嵌套的10倍交叉验证对SVM进行培训和测试,并测量和比较每个模型的平均准确性。>结果在人工审查中,有324份(16.2%)报告DVT阳性, PE阳性者为154(7.7%)。最佳DVT模型的平均灵敏度为0.80(95%CI为0.76至0.85),特异性为0.98(98%CI为0.97至0.99),阳性预测值(PPV)为0.89(95%CI为0.85至0.93)和曲线下面积(AUC)为0.98(95%CI为0.97至0.99)。最好的PE模型的灵敏度为0.79(95%CI 0.73至0.85),特异性为0.99(95%CI 0.98至0.99),PPV为0.84(95%CI 0.75至0.92)和AUC为0.99(95%CI 0.98)至1.00)。>结论统计NLP可以准确地从叙述性放射学报告中识别VTE。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号