首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Bone and Mineral Research >Prediction of New Clinical Vertebral Fractures in Elderly Men using Finite Element Analysis of CT Scans
【2h】

Prediction of New Clinical Vertebral Fractures in Elderly Men using Finite Element Analysis of CT Scans

机译:利用CT扫描的有限元分析预测老年人的新临床椎体骨折。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Vertebral strength, as estimated by finite element analysis of computed tomography (CT) scans, has not yet been compared against areal bone mineral density (BMD) by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) for prospectively assessing the risk of new clinical vertebral fractures. To do so, we conducted a case-cohort analysis of 306 men aged 65 yrs and older, which included 63 men who developed new clinically-identified vertebral fractures and 243 men who did not, all observed over an average of 6.5 years. Non-linear finite element analysis was performed on the baseline CT scans, blinded to fracture status, to estimate L1 vertebral compressive strength and a load-to-strength ratio. Volumetric BMD by quantitative CT and areal BMD by DXA were also evaluated. We found that, for the risk of new clinical vertebral fracture, the age-adjusted hazard ratio per standard deviation change for areal BMD (3.2; 95% CI: 2.0–5.2) was significantly lower (p<0.005) than for strength (7.2; 3.6–14.1), numerically lower than for volumetric BMD (5.7; 3.1–10.3), and similar for the load-to-strength ratio (3.0; 2.1–4.3). After also adjusting for race, BMI, clinical center, and areal BMD, all these hazard ratios remained highly statistically significant, particularly those for strength (8.5; 3.6–20.1) and volumetric BMD (9.4; 4.1–21.6). The area-under-the-curve for areal BMD (AUC=0.76) was significantly lower than for strength (AUC=0.83, p=0.02), volumetric BMD (AUC=0.82, p=0.05), and the load-to-strength ratio (AUC=0.82, p=0.05). We conclude that, compared to areal BMD by DXA, vertebral compressive strength and volumetric BMD consistently improved vertebral fracture risk assessment in this cohort of elderly men.
机译:通过计算机断层扫描(CT)扫描的有限元分析估计的椎体强度尚未通过双能X线骨密度仪(DXA)与区域骨矿物质密度(BMD)进行比较,以前瞻性评估新的临床椎骨骨折的风险。为此,我们对306名65岁及65岁以上的男性进行了病例队列分析,其中包括63名发展出新的经临床鉴定的椎体骨折的男性和243名未发现新的椎体骨折的男性,平均观察时间为6.5年。对基线CT扫描进行了非线性有限元分析,对骨折状态不了解,以估计L1椎体的抗压强度和负荷强度比。还评估了定量CT的体积BMD和DXA的面积BMD。我们发现,对于发生新的临床椎体骨折的风险,面积BMD(3.2; 95%CI:2.0–5.2)的每标准偏差改变的年龄调整后的危险比(p <0.005)显着低于强度(7.2) ; 3.6–14.1),在数值上低于体积BMD(5.7; 3.1–10.3),而载荷强度比(3.0; 2.1–4.3)相似。在对种族,BMI,临床中心和区域BMD进行调整后,所有这些危险比仍具有高度统计学意义,尤其是强度(8.5; 3.6–20.1)和体积BMD(9.4; 4.1–21.6)。面积BMD的曲线下面积(AUC = 0.76)显着低于强度(AUC = 0.83,p = 0.02),体积BMD(AUC = 0.82,p = 0.05)和承受荷载的曲线下面积。强度比(AUC = 0.82,p = 0.05)。我们得出的结论是,与DXA的区域BMD相比,该年龄段男性的椎体抗压强度和体积BMD持续改善了椎体骨折风险评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号