首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA >A meta-analysis of 16 randomized controlled trials to evaluate computer-based clinical reminder systems for preventive care in the ambulatory setting.
【2h】

A meta-analysis of 16 randomized controlled trials to evaluate computer-based clinical reminder systems for preventive care in the ambulatory setting.

机译:对16项随机对照试验的荟萃分析以评估基于计算机的临床提醒系统在门诊环境中的预防性护理。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

OBJECTIVE: Computer-based reminder systems have the potential to change physician and patient behaviors and to improve patient outcomes. We performed a meta-analysis of published randomized controlled trials to assess the overall effectiveness of computer-based reminder systems in ambulatory settings directed at preventive care. DESIGN: Meta-analysis. SEARCH STRATEGY: Searches of the Medline (1966-1994), Nursing and Allied Health (1982-1994), and Health Planning and Administration (1975-1994) databases identified 16 randomized, controlled trials of computer-based reminder systems in ambulatory settings. STATISTICAL METHODS: A weighted mixed effects model regression analysis was used to estimate intervention effects for computer and manual reminder systems for six classes of preventive practices. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Adjusted odds ratio for preventive practices. RESULTS: Computer reminders improved preventive practices compared with the control condition for vaccinations (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 3.09; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.39-4.00), breast cancer screening (OR 1.88; 95% CI 1.44-2.45), colorectal cancer screening (OR 2.25; 95% CI 1.74-2.91), and cardiovascular risk reduction (OR 2.01; 95% CI 1.55-2.61) but not cervical cancer screening (OR 1.15; 95% CI 0.89-1.49) or other preventive care (OR 1.02; 95% CI 0.79-1.32). For all six classes of preventive practices combined the adjusted OR was 1.77 (95% CI 1.38-2.27). CONCLUSION: Evidence from randomized controlled studies supports the effectiveness of data-driven computer-based reminder systems to improve prevention services in the ambulatory care setting.
机译:目的:基于计算机的提醒系统具有改变医师和患者行为并改善患者预后的潜力。我们对已发表的随机对照试验进行了荟萃分析,以评估基于计算机的提醒系统在针对预防保健的门诊环境中的总体有效性。设计:荟萃分析。搜索策略:对Medline(1966-1994),Nursing and Allied Health(1982-1994)和Health Planning and Administration(1975-1994)数据库进行搜索,确定了16项在非卧床环境中基于计算机的提醒系统的随机对照试验。统计方法:加权混合效应模型回归分析用于评估六类预防措施的计算机和手动提醒系统的干预效果。主要观察指标:调整预防措施的几率。结果:与疫苗接种的控制条件(调整后的优势比[OR] 3.09; 95%置信区间[CI] 2.39-4.00),乳腺癌筛查(OR 1.88; 95%CI 1.44-2.45)相比,计算机提醒可以改善预防措施;结肠直肠癌筛查(OR 2.25; 95%CI 1.74-2.91)和降低心血管疾病风险(OR 2.01; 95%CI 1.55-2.61)但不筛查宫颈癌(OR 1.15; 95%CI 0.89-1.49)或其他预防性护理(OR 1.02; 95%CI 0.79-1.32)。对于所有六类预防措施,调整后的OR均为1.77(95%CI 1.38-2.27)。结论:来自随机对照研究的证据支持了基于数据的计算机辅助提醒系统在改善门诊护理环境中的预防服务方面的有效性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号