首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine >Feasibility of Energy Medicine in a Community Teaching Hospital: An Exploratory Case Series
【2h】

Feasibility of Energy Medicine in a Community Teaching Hospital: An Exploratory Case Series

机译:社区教学医院能量医学的可行性:探索性案例系列

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background: Energy medicine (EM) derives from the theory that a subtle biologic energy can be influenced for therapeutic effect. EM practitioners may be trained within a specific tradition or work solo. Few studies have investigated the feasibility of solo-practitioner EM in hospitals.>Objective: This study investigated the feasibility of EM as provided by a solo practitioner in inpatient and emergent settings.>Design: Feasibility study, including a prospective case series.>Settings: Inpatient units and emergency department.>Outcome measures: To investigate the feasibility of EM, acceptability, demand, implementation, and practicality were assessed. Short-term clinical changes were documented by treating physicians.>Participants: Patients, employees, and family members were enrolled in the study only if study physicians expected no or slow improvement in specific symptoms. Those with secondary gains or who could not communicate perception of symptom change were excluded.>Results: EM was found to have acceptability and demand, and implementation was smooth because study procedures dovetailed with conventional clinical practice. Practicality was acceptable within the study but was low upon further application of EM because of cost of program administration. Twenty-four of 32 patients requested relief from pain. Of 50 reports of pain, 5 (10%) showed no improvement; 4 (8%), slight improvement; 3 (6%), moderate improvement; and 38 (76%), marked improvement. Twenty-one patients had issues other than pain. Of 29 non–pain-related problems, 3 (10%) showed no, 2 (7%) showed slight, 1 (4%) showed moderate, and 23 (79%) showed marked improvement. Changes during EM sessions were usually immediate.>Conclusions: This study successfully implemented EM provided by a solo practitioner in inpatient and emergent hospital settings and found that acceptability and demand justified its presence. Most patients experienced marked, immediate improvement of symptoms associated with their chief complaint. Substantial practicality issues must be addressed to implement EM clinically in a hospital, however.
机译:>背景:能量医学(EM)源自一种理论,即微妙的生物能量可能会影响治疗效果。 EM从业人员可以按照特定的传统或单独工作进行培训。很少有研究调查单行EM在医院中的可行性。>目的:该研究调查了单行医生在住院和急诊环境中提供EM的可行性。>设计:可行性研究,包括预期的病例系列。>设置:住院部门和急诊科室。>结果衡量指标:调查EM的可行性,可接受性,需求,实施和实用性被评估。治疗医师记录了短期临床变化。>参与者:仅当研究医师预期特定症状没有改善或缓慢改善时,才将患者,雇员和家属纳入研究。 >结果:发现EM具有可接受性和需求性,并且实施过程很顺利,因为研究程序与常规临床实践相吻合。在研究中实用性是可以接受的,但是由于程序管理的成本,在EM的进一步应用中实用性很低。 32位患者中有24位要求缓解疼痛。在50例疼痛报告中,有5例(10%)没有改善。 4(8%),略有改善; 3(6%),中等改善; 38个(76%),有明显改善。 21名患者有除疼痛以外的其他问题。在29个与疼痛无关的问题中,有3个(10%)表现为无,2(7%)表现为轻微,1(4%)表现为中度,23(79%)表现出明显的改善。 >结论:该研究成功地在住院和急诊医院环境中成功实施了由一名从业医生提供的EM,并发现可接受性和需求证明了它的存在是合理的。大多数患者经历了与主诉有关的症状的立即明显改善。但是,必须解决大量实用性问题才能在医院中临床实施EM。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号