首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine >Scientific Evaluation and Review of Claims in Health Care (SEaRCH): A Streamlined Systematic Phased Approach for Determining What Works in Healthcare
【2h】

Scientific Evaluation and Review of Claims in Health Care (SEaRCH): A Streamlined Systematic Phased Approach for Determining What Works in Healthcare

机译:科学评估和审查医疗保健索赔(SEaRCH):一种确定医疗保健有效方式的简化系统分阶段的方法

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background: Answering the question of “what works” in healthcare can be complex and requires the careful design and sequential application of systematic methodologies. Over the last decade, the Samueli Institute has, along with multiple partners, developed a streamlined, systematic, phased approach to this process called the Scientific Evaluation and Review of Claims in Health Care (SEaRCH™). The SEaRCH process provides an approach for rigorously, efficiently, and transparently making evidence-based decisions about healthcare claims in research and practice with minimal bias.>Methods: SEaRCH uses three methods combined in a coordinated fashion to help determine what works in healthcare. The first, the Claims Assessment Profile (CAP), seeks to clarify the healthcare claim and question, and its ability to be evaluated in the context of its delivery. The second method, the Rapid Evidence Assessment of the Literature (REAL©), is a streamlined, systematic review process conducted to determine the quantity, quality, and strength of evidence and risk/benefit for the treatment. The third method involves the structured use of expert panels (EPs). There are several types of EPs, depending on the purpose and need. Together, these three methods—CAP, REAL, and EP—can be integrated into a strategic approach to help answer the question “what works in healthcare?” and what it means in a comprehensive way.>Discussion: SEaRCH is a systematic, rigorous approach for evaluating healthcare claims of therapies, practices, programs, or products in an efficient and stepwise fashion. It provides an iterative, protocol-driven process that is customized to the intervention, consumer, and context. Multiple communities, including those involved in health service and policy, can benefit from this organized framework, assuring that evidence-based principles determine which healthcare practices with the greatest promise are used for improving the public's health and wellness.
机译:>背景:要回答医疗保健中的“行之有效”的问题可能很复杂,需要仔细设计并按顺序应用系统方法。在过去的十年中,萨穆利研究所(Samueli Institute)与多个合作伙伴一起针对此过程开发了一种精简,系统,分阶段的方法,称为“医疗保健索赔的科学评估和审查(SEaRCH™)”。 SEaRCH流程提供了一种方法,可以在偏差最小的情况下针对研究和实践中的医疗保健要求进行严格,有效和透明的决策。>方法: SEaRCH使用三种方法以协调的方式结合起来,以帮助确定什么在医疗保健中起作用​​。第一个是理赔评估资料(CAP),旨在阐明医疗保健理赔和问题及其在交付过程中进行评估的能力。第二种方法是文献快速证据评估(REAL ©),是一种简化的系统的审查过程,旨在确定证据的数量,质量和强度以及治疗的风险/益处。第三种方法涉及专家小组(EP)的结构化使用。 EP的类型有多种,具体取决于目的和需求。 CAP,REAL和EP这三种方法可以结合在一起,成为一种战略方法,以帮助回答“在医疗保健领域有什么用?”这一问题。 >讨论: SEaRCH是一种系统,严格的方法,可以有效,逐步地评估医疗保健对疗法,实践,程序或产品的要求。它提供了一个迭代的,协议驱动的过程,该过程针对干预,消费者和环境进行了定制。多个社区,包括参与卫生服务和政策的社区,都可以从此组织框架中受益,并确保以证据为基础的原则确定了那些最有希望的医疗实践用于改善公众的健康状况。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号