首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Applied Physiology >Ten days of repeated local forearm heating does not affect cutaneous vascular function
【2h】

Ten days of repeated local forearm heating does not affect cutaneous vascular function

机译:重复前臂局部加热十天不会影响皮肤血管功能

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The aim of the present study was to determine whether 10 days of repeated local heating could induce peripheral adaptations in the cutaneous vasculature and to investigate potential mechanisms of adaptation. We also assessed maximal forearm blood flow to determine whether repeated local heating affects maximal dilator capacity. Before and after 10 days of heat training consisting of 1-h exposures of the forearm to 42°C water or 32°C water (control) in the contralateral arm (randomized and counterbalanced), we assessed hyperemia to rapid local heating of the skin (n = 14 recreationally active young subjects). In addition, sequential doses of acetylcholine (ACh, 1 and 10 mM) were infused in a subset of subjects (n = 7) via microdialysis to study potential nonthermal microvascular adaptations following 10 days of repeated forearm heat training. Skin blood flow was assessed using laser-Doppler flowmetry, and cutaneous vascular conductance (CVC) was calculated as laser-Doppler red blood cell flux divided by mean arterial pressure. Maximal cutaneous vasodilation was achieved by heating the arm in a water-spray device for 45 min and assessed using venous occlusion plethysmography. Forearm vascular conductance (FVC) was calculated as forearm blood flow divided by mean arterial pressure. Repeated forearm heating did not increase plateau percent maximal CVC (CVCmax) responses to local heating (89 ± 3 vs. 89 ± 2% CVCmax, P = 0.19), 1 mM ACh (43 ± 9 vs. 53 ± 7% CVCmax, P = 0.76), or 10 mM ACh (61 ± 9 vs. 85 ± 7% CVCmax, P = 0.37, by 2-way repeated-measures ANOVA). There was a main effect of time at 10 mM ACh (P = 0.03). Maximal FVC remained unchanged (0.12 ± 0.02 vs. 0.14 ± 0.02 FVC, P = 0.30). No differences were observed in the control arm. Ten days of repeated forearm heating in recreationally active young adults did not improve the microvascular responsiveness to ACh or local heating.>NEW & NOTEWORTHY We show for the first time that 10 days of repeated forearm heating is not sufficient to improve cutaneous vascular responsiveness in recreationally active young adults. In addition, this is the first study to investigate cutaneous cholinergic sensitivity and forearm blood flow following repeated local heat exposure. Our data add to the limited studies regarding repeated local heating of the cutaneous vasculature.
机译:本研究的目的是确定重复局部加热10天是否可以诱导皮肤脉管系统的周围适应,并研究适应的潜在机制。我们还评估了前臂的最大血流量,以确定重复的局部加热是否会影响最大的扩张器容量。在10天的热训练前后,对侧手臂(随机和平衡)的前臂暴露于42°C水或32°C水(对照)中1小时(随机和平衡),我们评估了充血对皮肤的快速局部加热(n = 14位休闲活跃的年轻受试者)。此外,通过微量透析将连续剂量的乙酰胆碱(ACh,1和10 mM)注入一小组受试者(n = 7)中,以研究经过10天重复前臂加热训练后潜在的非热微血管适应性。使用激光多普勒血流仪评估皮肤血流量,并通过激光多普勒红细胞通量除以平均动脉压来计算皮肤血管电导(CVC)。通过在喷水装置中加热手臂45分钟来实现最大程度的皮肤血管舒张,并使用静脉阻塞体积描记法进行评估。前臂血管电导(FVC)计算为前臂血流量除以平均动脉压。重复的前臂加热并没有增加对局部加热的最高CVC(CVCmax)平台响应百分比(89±3 vs. 89±2%CVCmax,P = 0.19),1 mM ACh(43±9 vs. 53±7%CVCmax,P = 0.76)或10 mM ACh(通过2次重复测量ANOVA,CVCmax为61±9 vs. 85±7%,P = 0.37)。时间在10 mM ACh时具有主要影响(P = 0.03)。最大FVC保持不变(0.12±0.02与0.14±0.02 FVC,P = 0.30)。在对照组中未观察到差异。在活跃于运动的年轻人中重复前臂加热十天并不能改善对ACh或局部加热的微血管反应。> NEW&NOTEWORTHY 我们首次显示,重复前臂加热10天不足以使改善休闲活跃的年轻人的皮肤血管反应性。此外,这是第一个研究皮肤局部胆碱能敏感性和反复局部热暴露后前臂血流的研究。我们的数据增加了有关皮肤血管系统反复局部加热的有限研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号