首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA >Editors Choice: What do we know about developing patient portals? a systematic literature review
【2h】

Editors Choice: What do we know about developing patient portals? a systematic literature review

机译:编辑选择:我们对开发患者门户网站了解什么?系统的文献综述

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Objective Numerous articles have reported on the development of patient portals, including development problems and solutions. We review these articles to inform future patient portal development efforts and to provide a summary of the evidence base that can guide future research.>Materials and Methods We performed a systematic review of relevant literature to answer 5 questions: (1) What categories of problems related to patient portal development have been defined? (2) What causal factors have been identified by problem analysis and diagnosis? (3) What solutions have been proposed to ameliorate these causal factors? (4) Which proposed solutions have been implemented and in which organizational contexts? (5) Have implemented solutions been evaluated and what learning has been generated? Through searches on PubMed, ScienceDirect and LISTA, we included 109 articles.>Results We identified 5 main problem categories: achieving patient engagement, provider engagement, appropriate data governance, security and interoperability, and a sustainable business model. Further, we identified key factors contributing to these problems as well as solutions proposed to ameliorate them. While about half (45) of the 109 articles proposed solutions, fewer than half of these solutions (18) were implemented, and even fewer (5) were evaluated to generate learning about their effects.>Discussion Few studies systematically report on the patient portal development processes. As a result, the review does not provide an evidence base for portal development.>Conclusion Our findings support a set of recommendations for advancement of the evidence base: future research should build on existing evidence, draw on principles from design sciences conveyed in the problem-solving cycle, and seek to produce evidence within various different organizational contexts.
机译:>客观报告了许多有关患者门户网站开发的文章,包括开发问题和解决方案。我们审查这些文章,以为将来的患者门户开发工作提供信息,并提供可以指导未来研究的证据基础的总结。>材料和方法我们对相关文献进行了系统的综述,以回答5个问题:( 1)已经定义了与患者门户开发相关的问题的类别? (2)通过问题分析和诊断发现了哪些因果关系? (3)提出了哪些解决方案来改善这些因果关系? (4)哪些提议的解决方案已经实施,并且在哪些组织环境下得以实施? (5)是否评估了已实施的解决方案,并且产生了哪些学习成果?通过对PubMed,ScienceDirect和LISTA的搜索,我们收录了109条文章。>结果,我们确定了5个主要问题类别:实现患者参与,提供者参与,适当的数据治理,安全性和互操作性以及可持续的业务模型。此外,我们确定了导致这些问题的关键因素以及为改善这些问题而提出的解决方案。在109条文章中,大约一半(45)提出了解决方案,但只有不到一半的解决方案(18)得到了实施,甚至更少(5)的解决方案被评估以产生关于它们的效果的了解。>讨论系统地报告患者门户开发过程。因此,该审查不能为门户开发提供证据。>结论。我们的研究结果为推进证据基础提供了一系列建议:未来的研究应以现有证据为基础,并借鉴以下原则解决问题周期中传达的设计科学,并寻求在各种不同的组织环境中产生证据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号