首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>International Journal of Epidemiology >Do population-based interventions widen or narrow socioeconomic inequalities? The case of breastfeeding promotion
【2h】

Do population-based interventions widen or narrow socioeconomic inequalities? The case of breastfeeding promotion

机译:基于人群的干预措施是否扩大或缩小了社会经济不平等?促进母乳喂养的情况

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background: Despite numerous population-based randomized intervention trials, the impact of such interventions on socioeconomic inequalities has rarely been examined. We used data from a large cluster-randomized trial to assess the impact of a breastfeeding promotion intervention on socioeconomic inequalities in breastfeeding (exclusivity and duration) and in child cognitive ability at early school age.>Methods: The Promotion of Breastfeeding Intervention Trial (PROBIT) randomized 31 Belarusian maternity hospitals and their affiliated polyclinics either to receive a breastfeeding promotion intervention modelled on the WHO/UNICEF Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative or to continue the standard practices in effect at the time of randomization. We estimated and compared inequalities in discontinuation of exclusive breastfeeding before 3 months and of any breastfeeding before 12 months and in child verbal IQ at age 6.5 years, across maternal education strata between the two intervention arms.>Findings: Socioeconomic inequalities in discontinuing exclusive breastfeeding before 3 months were negligible in the control group. However, graded inequalities by maternal education emerged in the intervention group {relative risk [RR] = 1.12 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.04, 1.20] for partial university and RR = 1.20 [95% CI: 1.11, 1.31] for secondary education or less vs complete university; risk difference [RD] = 0.06 [95% CI: 0.03, 0.09] and 0.10 [95% CI: 0.06, 0.14], respectively}. For discontinuing any breastfeeding before 12 months, small socioeconomic gradients in the control group were widened in the intervention group (RR = 1.04 and 1.16, respectively, for mothers with secondary education or less). Despite these differential effects on breastfeeding, however, we observed a small, nonsignificant reduction in socioeconomic inequalities in child verbal IQ at age 6.5 years.>Conclusions: A population-based intervention to promote breastfeeding slightly widened socioeconomic inequalities in breastfeeding but not those in child cognitive ability.
机译:>背景:尽管进行了许多基于人群的随机干预试验,但很少研究此类干预对社会经济不平等的影响。我们使用来自大型随机分组试验的数据来评估母乳喂养促进干预对学龄早期母乳喂养的社会经济不平等(排他性和持续时间)以及儿童认知能力的影响。>方法:母乳喂养干预试验(PROBIT)随机将31家白俄罗斯产科医院及其附属综合诊所接受以WHO / UNICEF爱婴医院倡议为蓝本的母乳喂养促进干预措施,或在随机化时继续有效的标准做法。我们估算并比较了两个干预部门之间在孕产妇教育层次上三个月前停止纯母乳喂养和十二个月前任何母乳喂养以及6.5岁儿童口头智商的不平等。>发现:对照组在3个月前停止纯母乳喂养的不平等现象可以忽略不计。但是,干预组出现了由母体教育分等级的不平等现象:部分大学的相对风险[RR] = 1.12 [95%置信区间(CI):1.04,1.20],而对于部分大学,RR = 1.20 [95%CI:1.11,1.31]中等教育或以下与完全大学;风险差异[RD]分别为0.06 [95%CI:0.03,0.09]和0.10 [95%CI:0.06,0.14]}。为了在12个月前停止任何母乳喂养,干预组的对照组的社会经济梯度较小(中等教育程度或以下的母亲分别为RR = 1.04和1.16)。尽管对母乳喂养有这些不同的影响,但是,我们观察到在6.5岁时儿童口头智商的社会经济不平等程度有小幅但不显着的下降。>结论:以人群为基础的促进母乳喂养的干预措施稍微扩大了中国的社会经济不平等程度母乳喂养,但对儿童认知能力不高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号