首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine >Bayesian network meta-analysis of the effects of single-incision laparoscopic surgery conventional laparoscopic appendectomy and open appendectomy for the treatment of acute appendicitis
【2h】

Bayesian network meta-analysis of the effects of single-incision laparoscopic surgery conventional laparoscopic appendectomy and open appendectomy for the treatment of acute appendicitis

机译:贝叶斯网络荟萃分析单切口腹腔镜手术常规腹腔镜阑尾切除术和开放性阑尾切除术治疗急性阑尾炎的疗效

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The present study aimed to systematically evaluate the effectiveness of single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS), conventional laparoscopic appendectomy (CLA) and open appendectomy (OA) for the treatment of acute appendicitis. PubMed and Embase databases were systematically searched to identify relevant studies comparing the effectiveness of different appendectomy methods for treating acute appendicitis published prior to April 2016. ADDIS 1.16.5 software was used for data analysis. Heterogeneity was assessed using I2 statistic. Odds ratios or standardized mean differences and 95% confidence intervals were calculated and pooled accordingly. Consistency was assessed using node-splitting analysis and inconsistency standard deviation. Convergence was assessed with the Brooks-Gelman-Rubin method using Potential Scale Reduction Factor (PSRF). Surgical procedure duration, duration of hospital stay, wound infection and incidence of abscesses were compared. A total of 24 eligible studies were included in this meta-analysis. A consistency model was used to pool data regarding the four outcomes. The PSRFs in each item were all <1.03. Pooled results showed that, compared with OA, SILS and CLA were associated with significantly shorter durations of hospital stay (all P<0.01) and lower risk of wound infection (SILS vs. OA P=0.02 and CLA vs. OA P<0.01, respectively), but no significant differences were identified between SILS and CLA. However, compared with OA, SILS exhibited a significantly longer surgical procedure duration (P=0.01) and lower incidence of abscesses (P=0.04), while no significant difference was observed between OA and CLA. This comprehensive network meta-analysis indicated that laparoscopic appendectomy, including SILS and CLA, may have more advantages for acute appendicitis compared with OA. Furthermore, SILS procedures require improvement and simplification to reduce the surgical procedure duration.
机译:本研究旨在系统评价单切口腹腔镜手术(SILS),常规腹腔镜阑尾切除术(CLA)和开放式阑尾切除术(OA)在治疗急性阑尾炎中的有效性。系统搜索了PubMed和Embase数据库,以鉴定相关研究,比较2016年4月之前发布的不同阑尾切除术治疗急性阑尾炎的有效性。ADDIS1.16.5软件用于数据分析。使用I 2 统计量评估异质性。计算赔率或标准化均值差以及95%的置信区间,并相应地进行合并。使用节点分解分析和不一致标准偏差评估一致性。使用Brooks-Gelman-Rubin方法使用潜在规模缩小因子(PSRF)评估收敛性。比较手术时间,住院时间,伤口感染和脓肿的发生率。这项荟萃分析共纳入24项合格研究。一致性模型用于汇总有关四个结果的数据。每个项目的PSRF均<1.03。汇总结果显示,与OA相比,SILS和CLA与住院时间显着缩短(所有P <0.01)和伤口感染风险降低(SILS vs. OA P = 0.02和CLA vs. OA P <0.01)相关, ),但在SILS和CLA之间未发现明显差异。但是,与OA相比,SILS的手术时间明显更长(P = 0.01),脓肿的发生率更低(P = 0.04),而OA和CLA之间没有显着差异。这项全面的网络荟萃分析表明,与OA相比,包括SILS和CLA在内的腹腔镜阑尾切除术在急性阑尾炎方面可能具有更多优势。此外,SILS手术需要改进和简化,以减少手术时间。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号