首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of International Oral Health : JIOH >Evaluation of Different Methods for Removing OralBiofilm in Patients Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit
【2h】

Evaluation of Different Methods for Removing OralBiofilm in Patients Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit

机译:评价不同的去除口腔方法进入重症监护室的患者的生物膜

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

>Background: The present study aimed to evaluate the different methods for removing oral biofilm in combination with 0.12% chlorhexidine, in patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) of the General University Hospital. >Materials and Methods: Initially, the patients were included in the study and underwent periodontal evaluation by means of the visible plaque index (VPI) and gingival bleeding index (GBI). The removal of visible biofilm, by a professional, was carried out using a toothbrush and dental floss, followed by the application of a 0.12% chlorhexidine solution. The patients were included in this randomized and controlled study into four groups (total n = 48), as follows: Chlorhexidine and gauze 12/12 h; chlorhexidine and gauze 24/24 h; chlorhexidine and brushing 12/12 h; chlorhexidine and brushing 24/24 h. The patients underwent the biofilm removal protocol for7 days and then were subjected to a new clinical evaluation as toVPI and GBI. Data analysis was performed through stratification andarrangement of the records, in order to carry out the associationswith health indicators used in the study, and the statistical testsused were Kappa and t-test for independent and paired samples.>Results:A decrease in the VPI and GBI values when comparing baseline to thefinal evaluation for all groups was observed.>Conclusion:Based on the methodology, it was possible to concluded thatchlorhexidine associated with the mechanical action of thetoothbrush or gauze in the times 12 h and 24 h in the ICUenvironment presented the same results as regards amount of visiblebiofilm.>How to cite the article:Oliveira MS, Borges AH, Mattos FZ, Semenoff TA, Segundo AS, TonettoMR, Bandeca MC, Porto AN. Evaluation of different methods forremoving oral biofilm in patients admitted to the intensive careunit. J Int Oral Health 2014;6(3):61-4.
机译:>背景:本研究旨在评估在通用大学医院重症监护病房(ICU)入院的患者中,与0.12%洗必泰联用的去除口腔生物膜的不同方法。 >材料和方法:最初,将患者纳入研究,并通过可见斑块指数(VPI)和牙龈出血指数(GBI)进行牙周评估。由专业人员使用牙刷和牙线去除可见的生物膜,然后施加0.12%的洗必太溶液。该患者被随机分为四组(总数n = 48),分别为:洗必泰和纱布12/12 h;洗必泰和纱布24/24 h;洗必太,涂刷12/12 h;洗必太并刷牙24/24小时。患者接受了生物膜去除协议7天,然后接受新的临床评估VPI和GBI。数据分析通过分层和记录的安排,以便进行协会研究中使用的健康指标以及统计测试对于独立样本和配对样本,使用的是Kappa和t检验。>结果:与基线相比,VPI和GBI值降低观察所有组的最终评估。>结论:根据该方法,可以得出以下结论:与氯己定有关的机械作用在ICU中,牙刷或纱布在12小时和24小时内环境呈现出与可见光量相同的结果生物膜。>如何引用该文章:奥利维拉(Oliveira)女士,博尔赫斯(Borges AH),马托斯FZ,塞梅诺夫(Semenoff TA),塞贡多(Segundo)AS,托内托(Tonetto)先生,班德卡MC,波尔图AN。评估不同方法重症监护病人的口腔生物膜清除单元。国际口腔卫生杂志2014; 6(3):61-4。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号