首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Blood >Melphalan prednisone and thalidomide vs melphalan prednisone and lenalidomide (ECOG E1A06) in untreated multiple myeloma
【2h】

Melphalan prednisone and thalidomide vs melphalan prednisone and lenalidomide (ECOG E1A06) in untreated multiple myeloma

机译:美法仑泼尼松和沙利度胺与美法仑泼尼松和来那度胺(ECOG E1A06)在未治疗的多发性骨髓瘤中的作用

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This phase 3 trial (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group [ECOG] E1A06) compared melphalan, prednisone, and thalidomide (MPT-T) with melphalan, prednisone, and lenalidomide (mPR-R) in patients with untreated multiple myeloma (MM). A noninferiority design was used, and inferiority was defined as a progression-free survival (PFS) hazard ratio (HR) of MPT-T/mPR-R ≤0.82. A total of 306 patients enrolled, with a median age of 75.7 years. Median follow-up was 40.7 months. Median time on therapy was 12.1 months and 23.1 months for the 46.6% of treated patients who received maintenance, with no differences by arm. Median PFS was 21 months on MPT-T and 18.7 months on mPR-R (HR, 0.84; 95% confidence interval, 0.64-1.09). Overall survival was 52.6 months (MPT-T) vs 47.7 months (mPR-R) (P = .476). Per-protocol response rates were 63.6% (MPT-T) and 59.9% (mPR-R) (P = .557). Grade ≥3 nonhematologic toxicity was 59.5% for MPT-T vs 40.0% for mPR-R (P = .001). Second malignancies were observed in 18 MPT-T patients vs 14 mPR-R patients. Quality-of-life analysis favored mPR-R by induction end (P = .007). Use of MPT-T or mPR-R in elderly patients with untreated MM demonstrates no statistical or clinically relevant differences in response rates, PFS, and OS; however, quality of life at end of induction was improved and lower toxicity reported with mPR-R. This trial was registered at as #.
机译:这项3期试验(东部合作肿瘤小组[ECOG] E1A06)在未经治疗的多发性骨髓瘤(MM)患者中比较了美法仑,泼尼松和沙利度胺(MPT-T)与美法仑,泼尼松和来那度胺(mPR-R)。使用非劣效性设计,劣质性定义为MPT-T / mPR-R≤0.82的无进展生存(PFS)危险比(HR)。共有306名患者入组,中位年龄为75.7岁。中位随访时间为40.7个月。接受维持治疗的接受治疗的患者中有46.6%的患者接受治疗的中位时间分别为12.1个月和23.1个月,两组之间无差异。 MPT-T的中位PFS为21个月,mPR-R的中位PFS为18.7个月(HR,0.84; 95%置信区间,0.64-1.09)。总生存期为52.6个月(MPT-T)与47.7个月(mPR-R)(P = .476)。每个协议的响应率分别为63.6%(MPT-T)和59.9%(mPR-R)(P = .557)。 MPT-T的≥3级非血液学毒性为59.5%,而mPR-R为40.0%(P = .001)。在18例MPT-T患者与14例mPR-R患者中观察到第二次恶性肿瘤。生活质量分析在诱导端偏爱mPR-R(P = .007)。在未经治疗的MM老年患者中使用MPT-T或mPR-R表现出反应率,PFS和OS方面无统计学或临床相关差异;然而,使用mPR-R可以提高诱导结束时的生活质量,并降低毒性。该试用版注册为#。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号