首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>American Journal of Epidemiology >Socioeconomic Status Structural and Functional Measures of Social Support and Mortality
【2h】

Socioeconomic Status Structural and Functional Measures of Social Support and Mortality

机译:社会经济地位社会支持的结构和功能指标以及死亡率

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The authors examined the associations of social support with socioeconomic status (SES) and with mortality, as well as how SES differences in social support might account for SES differences in mortality. Analyses were based on 9,333 participants from the British Whitehall II Study cohort, a longitudinal cohort established in 1985 among London-based civil servants who were 35–55 years of age at baseline. SES was assessed using participant's employment grades at baseline. Social support was assessed 3 times in the 24.4-year period during which participants were monitored for death. In men, marital status, and to a lesser extent network score (but not low perceived support or high negative aspects of close relationships), predicted both all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. Measures of social support were not associated with cancer mortality. Men in the lowest SES category had an increased risk of death compared with those in the highest category (for all-cause mortality, hazard ratio = 1.59, 95% confidence interval: 1.21, 2.08; for cardiovascular mortality, hazard ratio = 2.48, 95% confidence interval: 1.55, 3.92). Network score and marital status combined explained 27% (95% confidence interval: 14, 43) and 29% (95% confidence interval: 17, 52) of the associations between SES and all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, respectively. In women, there was no consistent association between social support indicators and mortality. The present study suggests that in men, social isolation is not only an important risk factor for mortality but is also likely to contribute to differences in mortality by SES.
机译:作者研究了社会支持与社会经济地位(SES)和死亡率的关系,以及社会支持中SES的差异如何解释SES的死亡率差异。分析来自英国白厅II研究队列的9333名参与者,该队列纵向队列于1985年在基线年龄为35-55岁的伦敦公务员中建立。在基线时使用参与者的就业等级对SES进行了评估。在24.4年期间对参与者的死亡进行了3次评估,评估了其社会支持。在男性中,婚姻状况以及较小程度上的网络评分(但并非低的知觉支持率或亲密关系的高负面影响)可以预测全因和心血管疾病的死亡率。社会支持的措施与癌症死亡率无关。与最高类别的男性相比,SES最低的类别的男人的死亡风险更高(全因死亡率,危险比= 1.59,95%置信区间:1.21,2.08;心血管疾病的死亡率,危险比= 2.48,95 %置信区间:1.55、3.92)。网络评分和婚姻状况的总和分别解释了SES与全因和心血管疾病死亡率之间关联的27%(95%置信区间:14、43)和29%(95%置信区间:17、52)。在女性中,社会支持指标与死亡率之间没有一致的关联。本研究表明,在男性中,社会孤立不仅是死亡率的重要危险因素,而且还可能导致SES死亡率的差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号