首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Acta Orthopaedica >Resurfacing hip arthroplasty better preserves a normal gait pattern at increasing walking speeds compared to total hip arthroplasty
【2h】

Resurfacing hip arthroplasty better preserves a normal gait pattern at increasing walking speeds compared to total hip arthroplasty

机译:与全髋关节置换术相比重塑髋关节置换术可以在步行速度提高时更好地保持正常步态

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background and purpose — Gait analysis performed under increased physical demand may detect differences in gait between total (THA) versus resurfacing hip arthroplasty (RHA), which are not measured at normal walking speed. We hypothesized that patients after RHA would reach higher walking speeds and inclines compared with THA. Additionally, an RHA would enable a more natural gait when comparing the operated with the healthy contralateral hip.Patients and methods — From a randomized controlled trial comparing THA with RHA with at least 5 years’ follow-up patients with a UCLA score of more than 3 points (n = 34) were included for an instrumented treadmill gait analysis. 25 patients with a unilateral implant (primary analysis—16 THA versus 9 RHA) and 9 patients with a bilateral implant (sub-analysis—n = 5 RHA + THA; n = 4 THA + THA). Spatiotemporal parameters, ground reaction forces, and range of motion were recorded at increasing walking speeds and inclines. Functional outcome scores were obtained.Results — At a normal walking speed of 1.1 m/s and at increasing inclines no differences were recorded in gait between the 2 groups with a unilateral hip implant. With increasing walking speed the RHA group reached a higher top walking speed (TWS) (adjusted difference 0.07 m/s, 95% CI –0.11 to 0.25) compared with THA. Additionally, RHA patients tolerated more weight on the operated side at TWS (155 N, CI 49–261) and as such weight-bearing approached the unaffected contralateral side. For the RHA group a “between leg difference” of 8 N (CI 3–245) was measured versus –129 N (CI –138 to –29) for THA (adjusted difference 144 N, CI 20–261). Hip flexion of the operated side at TWS was higher after RHA compared with THA (adjusted difference 8°, CI 1.7–14).Interpretation — In this study RHA patients reached a higher walking speed, and preserved a more normal weight acceptance and a greater range of hip flexion against their contralateral healthy leg as compared with patients with a THA.
机译:背景和目的-在体力需求增加的情况下进行的步态分析可能会检测到总体(THA)与表面置换髋关节置换术(RHA)之间的步态差异,这在正常的步行速度下无法测量。我们假设,与THA相比,RHA后的患者将达到更高的行走速度和倾斜度。此外,当将手术与健康的对侧髋部进行比较时,RHA可使步态更加自然。患者和方法—来自一项随机对照试验,比较了至少5年随访且UCLA得分大于5分的THA和RHA。仪器跑步机步态分析包括3点(n = 34)。 25例单侧植入物的患者(主要分析— 16 THA vs 9 RHA)和9例双侧植入物的患者(亚分析— n = 5 RHA + THA; n = 4 THA + THA)。时空参数,地面反作用力和运动范围在步行速度和倾斜度增加时记录下来。获得了功能性结果评分。结果-在正常行走速度为1.1 m / s且倾斜度增加的情况下,单侧髋关节植入物的两组步态无差异。与步行速度相比,RHA组的步行速度最高(调整后的差异为0.07 m / s,95%CI – 0.11至0.25)达到了更高的最高步行速度(TWS)。此外,RHA患者在TWS(155 N,CI 49-261)的手术侧可以承受更大的重量,因此承重接近未受影响的对侧。对于RHA组,测得的“腿间差异”为8 N(CI 3–245),而THA的“腿间差异”为–129 N(CI –138至–29)(调整后的差异144 N,CI 20–261)。与THA相比,RHA后TWS手术侧的髋关节屈曲度更高(调整后的差值为8°,CI 1.7–14)。解释—在这项研究中,RHA患者步行速度更高,并能保持较正常的体重接受和更大的重量。与THA患者相比,其对侧健康小腿的髋部屈曲范围较大。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号