首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education >Comparing Effectiveness of High-Fidelity Human Patient Simulation vs Case-Based Learning in Pharmacy Education
【2h】

Comparing Effectiveness of High-Fidelity Human Patient Simulation vs Case-Based Learning in Pharmacy Education

机译:在药房教育中比较高保真度人类患者模拟与基于案例的学习的效果

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Objective. To determine whether human patient simulation (HPS) is superior to case-based learning (CBL) in teaching diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) and thyroid storm (TS) to pharmacy students.>Design. In this cross-over, open-label, single center, randomized control trial, final-year undergraduate pharmacy students enrolled in an applied therapeutics course were randomized to HPS or CBL groups. Pretest, posttest, knowledge retention tests, and satisfaction survey were administered to students.>Assessment. One hundred seventy-four students participated in this study. The effect sizes attributable to HPS were larger than CBL in both cases. HPS groups performed significantly better in posttest and knowledge retention test compared to CBL groups pertaining to TS case (p<0.05). Students expressed high levels of satisfaction with HPS sessions.>Conclusion. HPS was superior to CBL in teaching DKA and TS to final-year undergraduate pharmacy students.
机译:>目标。要确定在向药房学生教授糖尿病性酮症酸中毒(DKA)和甲状腺风暴(TS)方面,人类患者模拟(HPS)是否优于基于案例的学习(CBL)。>设计。 在这项交叉,开放标签,单中心,随机对照试验中,参加了应用治疗课程的最后一年的大学药学专业的学生被随机分配到HPS或CBL组。对学生进行了前测,后测,知识保留测试和满意度调查。>评估。一百七十四名学生参加了这项研究。在这两种情况下,归因于HPS的效应量均大于CBL。与属于TS病例的CBL组相比,HPS组在后测和知识保留测试中的表现明显更好(p <0.05)。学生对HPS课程表示高度满意。>结论。HPS在面向本科药学专业学生的DKA和TS教学方面优于CBL。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号