首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education >Assessment of Streams of Knowledge Skill and Attitude Development Across the Doctor of Pharmacy Curriculum
【2h】

Assessment of Streams of Knowledge Skill and Attitude Development Across the Doctor of Pharmacy Curriculum

机译:评估整个药学课程的知识技能和态度发展流

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Objective. To continue efforts of quality assurance following a 5-year curricular mapping and course peer review process, 18 topics (“streams”) of knowledge, skills, and attitudes were assessed across the doctor of pharmacy (PharmD) curriculum.>Design. The curriculum committee merged the 18 topics into 9 streams. Nine ad hoc committees (“stream teams”) of faculty members and preceptors evaluated the content, integration, and assessment for their assigned streams across the 4 professional years. Committees used a reporting tool and curriculum database to complete their reviews.>Assessment. After each team presented their findings and recommendations at a faculty retreat, the 45 faculty members were asked to list their top priorities for curriculum improvement. The 5 top priorities identified were: redefinition and clarification of program outcomes; improved coordination of streams across the curriculum; consistent repetition and assessment of math skills throughout the curriculum; focused nonprescription and self-care teaching into an individual course; and improved development of problem solving.>Conclusions. This comprehensive assessment enabled the college to identify areas for curriculum improvement that were not readily apparent to the faculty from prior reviews of individual courses.
机译:>目标。为了在5年的课程规划和课程同行评审过程之后继续进行质量保证,我们在整个药学专业对18个主题(“流”)的知识,技能和态度进行了评估( PharmD)课程。>设计。课程委员会将18个主题合并为9个流。九个教职员工和主持人特设委员会(“团队”)评估了他们在四个专业年中分配的课程的内容,整合和评估。委员会使用报告工具和课程数据库来完成他们的审查。>评估。每个团队在教师静修会上提出他们的发现和建议后,要求45名教师列出其课程改进的首要任务。确定的5个最高优先事项是:重新定义和澄清计划成果;改善整个课程流的协调;在整个课程中对数学技能进行一致的重复和评估;将非处方和自我护理教学重点放在个人课程中; >结论。这项全面的评估使学院能够从以前对单个课程的审查中,确定教员不容易发现的课程改进领域。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号