首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene >Sampling Host-Seeking Anthropophilic Mosquito Vectors in West Africa: Comparisons of An Active Human-Baited Tent-Trap against Gold Standard Methods
【2h】

Sampling Host-Seeking Anthropophilic Mosquito Vectors in West Africa: Comparisons of An Active Human-Baited Tent-Trap against Gold Standard Methods

机译:在西非采样寻找宿主的嗜人类蚊子:活性人诱捕帐篷与黄金标准方法的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In this study, we characterize the ability of the previously described Infoscitex tent (IST) to capture mosquitoes in comparison to either the Centers for Disease Control Light Trap hung next to individuals under a bed net (LTC) or to human landing catches (HLC). In Senegal, the IST caught 6.14 times the number of Anopheles gambiae sensu lato (s.l.), and 8.78 times the Culex group V mosquitoes as LTC. In one of two locations in Burkina Faso, the IST caught An. gambiae at a rate not significantly different than HLC. Of importance, 9.1–36.1% of HLC caught An. gambiae were blood fed, mostly with fresh blood, suggesting they fed upon the collector, whereas only 0.5–5.0% from the IST had partial or old blood. The IST also caught outdoor biting species in proportions comparable to HLC. The results show this tent provides a safer and effective alternative to the skill-dependent, risky, and laborious HLC method.
机译:在这项研究中,我们与悬挂在蚊帐下的疾病控制中心(LTC)或人类着陆捕获物(HLC)相比,描述了先前描述的Infoscitex帐篷(IST)捕获蚊子的能力。 。在塞内加尔,IST捕获到的冈比亚按蚊(s.l.)数量是原先的LTC的6.14倍,是库克斯V组蚊子的8.78倍。在布基纳法索的两个地点之一,IST抓住了An。冈比亚的比率与HLC并无显着差异。重要的是,有9.1–36.1%的HLC感染了An。冈比亚是用血液喂养的,大部分是新鲜血液,表明它们以采集者为食,而IST中只有0.5–5.0%的血液是部分或旧的。 IST还捕获了与HLC相当的户外叮咬物种。结果表明,该帐篷为依赖技能,风险高且费力的HLC方法提供了一种更安全有效的替代方法。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号