首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings >Evaluation of automated term groupings for detecting anaphylactic shock signals for drugs
【2h】

Evaluation of automated term groupings for detecting anaphylactic shock signals for drugs

机译:评估自动术语分组以检测药物过敏性休克信号

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Signal detection in pharmacovigilance should take into account all terms related to a medical concept rather than a single term. We built an OWL-DL file with formal definitions of MedDRA and SNOMED-CT concepts and performed two queries, Query 1 and 2, to retrieve narrow and broad terms within the Standard MedDRA Query (SMQ) related to ‘anaphylactic shock’ and the terms from the High Level Term (HLT) grouping related to ‘anaphylaxis’. We compared values of the EB05 (EBGM) statistical test for disproportionality with 50 active ingredients randomly selected in the public version of the FDA pharmacovigilance database. Coefficient of correlation was R2 = 1.00 between Query 1 and HLT; R2 = 0.98 between Query 1 and SMQ narrow; R2 = 0.89 between Query 2 and SMQ Narrow+Broad. Generating automated groupings of terms for signal detection is feasible but requires additional efforts in modeling MedDRA terms in order to improve precision and recall of these groupings.
机译:药物警戒中的信号检测应考虑与医学概念相关的所有术语,而不是单个术语。我们使用MedDRA和SNOMED-CT概念的正式定义构建了一个OWL-DL文件,并执行了两个查询Query 1和2,以检索标准MedDRA Query(SMQ)中与“过敏性休克”有关的狭义和广义术语。来自与“过敏反应”相关的高级术语(HLT)分组。我们比较了EB05(EBGM)统计测试值与FDA药物警戒数据库公开版本中随机选择的50种活性成分的不相称性。查询1和HLT之间的相关系数为R 2 = 1.00;在查询1和SMQ窄之间,R 2 = 0.98;在查询2和SMQ Narrow + Broad之间,R 2 = 0.89。生成用于信号检测的自动术语分组是可行的,但是需要在MedDRA术语建模中付出额外的努力,以提高这些分组的精度和召回率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号