首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Ambio >Is There a Metabolism of an Urban Ecosystem? An Ecological Critique
【2h】

Is There a Metabolism of an Urban Ecosystem? An Ecological Critique

机译:城市生态系统是否存在新陈代谢?生态批评

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The energy and material flows of a city are often described as urban metabolism (UM), which is put forward as a way to link a city’s ecology and economy. UM draws parallels to the biology of individual organisms, yet the analogy is misapplied. In striving to be interdisciplinary, UM makes this organismic comparison rather than identifying the city as an ecosystem, thereby ignoring developments in ecological theory. Using inappropriate rhetoric misdirects researchers, which influences scientific investigation—from problem statements to interpretations. UM is valuable in quantifying the city’s use of natural resources but does not achieve a comprehensive, integrated analysis of the urban ecosystem. To realize an interdisciplinary, perhaps transdisciplinary, understanding of urban ecology, researchers need to emphasize the essential tenets of material flows analysis, view the city as an ecosystem, and use language that properly reflects current knowledge, theory, and conceptual frameworks in the foundational disciplines.
机译:城市的能源和物质流通常被称为城市新陈代谢(UM),它被提出来将城市的生态与经济联系起来。 UM与单个生物的生物学有相似之处,但这种类推法是错误的。在努力成为跨学科领域时,UM进行了这种有机比较,而不是将城市确定为生态系统,从而无视生态理论的发展。使用不恰当的措辞会误导研究人员,这会影响科学研究(从问题陈述到解释)。 UM在量化城市对自然资源的使用方面具有重要价值,但无法实现对城市生态系统的全面综合分析。为了实现跨学科(也许是跨学科)的城市生态学理解,研究人员需要强调物质流分析的基本原则,将城市视为生态系统,并使用能够正确反映基础学科中当前知识,理论和概念框架的语言。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号