首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Applied and Environmental Microbiology >Comparison of media for isolation of poultry intestinal bacteria.
【2h】

Comparison of media for isolation of poultry intestinal bacteria.

机译:家禽肠道细菌分离培养基的比较。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The effects of medium composition, incubation temperature, and length of incubation were determined for recovery of the predominant intestinal bacteria from turkey poults. Incubation of recovery media at 41 degrees C resulted in significantly higher counts than at 37 degrees C. In 2- and 3-week-old turkey poults. RGCAP-30, RGCAP-10, and RGCA-30 gave the highest recoveries of cecal bacteria. M98-5 was less effective and brain heart infusion agar was definitely inadequate. However, there was no significant difference between RGCAP-30 and brain heart infusion agar for recovery of duodenal bacteria. In older birds (6 weeks of age), M98-5 was equal or superior to the RGCA-based media. The choice of a primary isolation medium is thus dependent on the site to be sampled and the age of the bird.
机译:确定培养基组成,孵育温度和孵育时间的影响,以从火鸡中回收主要的肠道细菌。恢复培养基在41摄氏度下孵育比37摄氏度下显着更高的计数。在2周龄和3周龄的火鸡家禽中。 RGCAP-30,RGCAP-10和RGCA-30的盲肠细菌回收率最高。 M98-5的疗效较差,并且脑部琼脂灌注液绝对不足。但是,RGCAP-30和脑心脏琼脂在十二指肠细菌的恢复方面没有显着差异。在年龄较大的鸟类(6周龄)中,M98-5等于或优于基于RGCA的培养基。因此,主要隔离介质的选择取决于要采样的地点和禽类的年龄。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号