【2h】

The impact factor revisited

机译:再谈影响因素

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The number of scientific journals has become so large that individuals, institutions and institutional libraries cannot completely store their physical content. In order to prioritize the choice of quality information sources, librarians and scientists are in need of reliable decision aids. The "impact factor" (IF) is the most commonly used assessment aid for deciding which journals should receive a scholarly submission or attention from research readership. It is also an often misunderstood tool. This narrative review explains how the IF is calculated, how bias is introduced into the calculation, which questions the IF can or cannot answer, and how different professional groups can benefit from IF use.
机译:科学期刊的数量如此之大,以至于个人,机构和机构图书馆无法完全存储其物理内容。为了优先选择高质量的信息源,图书馆员和科学家需要可靠的决策辅助工具。 “影响因子”(IF)是最常用的评估工具,用于确定哪些期刊应受到研究读者的学术贡献或关注。它也是一个经常被误解的工具。这篇叙述性评论解释了如何计算IF,如何在计算中引入偏差,IF可以回答或不能回答的问题以及不同的专业团体如何从IF的使用中受益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号