首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>BJPsych Bulletin >Socioeconomic status and prescribing for schizophrenia: analysis of 3200 cases from the Glasgow Psychosis Clinical Information System (PsyCIS)
【2h】

Socioeconomic status and prescribing for schizophrenia: analysis of 3200 cases from the Glasgow Psychosis Clinical Information System (PsyCIS)

机译:社会经济状况和精神分裂症的处方:格拉斯哥精神病临床信息系统(PsyCIS)对3200例病例的分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Aims and method To investigate whether socioeconomic status influenced rates of depot medication prescribing, polypharmacy (more than two psychotropic medications), newer (second-generation) antipsychotic prescribing and clozapine therapy. Postcodes, Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation (SIMD) categories and current medication status were ascertained. Patients in the most deprived SIMD groups (8-10 combined) were compared with those in the most affluent SIMD groups (1-3 combined).>Results Overall, 3200 patients with ICD-10 schizophrenia were identified. No clear relationship between socioeconomic status and any of the four prescribing areas was identified, although rates of depot medication use in deprived areas were slightly higher.>Clinical implications Contrary to our hypothesis, there was no evidence that patients with schizophrenia within NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde who live in more deprived communities had different prescribing experiences from patients living in more affluent areas.
机译:>目标和方法:调查社会经济状况是否影响储库药物处方,多药(超过两种精神药物),新型(第二代)抗精神病药物处方和氯氮平治疗的发生率。确定邮政编码,多重剥夺性苏格兰索引(SIMD)类别和当前用药状况。将最贫困的SIMD组(共8-10个)与最富裕的SIMD组(1-3个)进行比较。>结果总体上,确定了3200名ICD-10精神分裂症患者。尽管在贫困地区使用长效药物的比例略高,但并未确定社会经济状况与四个处方区域中任何一个之间的明确关系。>临床意义与我们的假设相反,没有证据表明患有糖尿病的患者NHS大格拉斯哥和克莱德地区的精神分裂症患者生活在更加贫困的社区,他们的处方经验与生活在较富裕地区的患者不同。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号