首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>BMC Cancer >Robot-assisted esophagectomy (RAE) versus conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: protocol for a multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial (RAMIE trial robot-assisted minimally invasive Esophagectomy)
【2h】

Robot-assisted esophagectomy (RAE) versus conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: protocol for a multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial (RAMIE trial robot-assisted minimally invasive Esophagectomy)

机译:机器人辅助食管切除术(RAE)与常规微创食管切除术(MIE)用于可切除食管鳞状细胞癌:一项多中心前瞻性随机对照试验的方案(RAMIE试验机器人辅助微创食管切除术)

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundCurrently, there are three main surgical approaches for resectable esophageal cancer: open transthoracic esophagectomy (OTE), conventional minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) and robot-assisted esophagectomy (RAE). Previous studies had demonstrated the better short-term outcomes in MIE or RAE when compared to OTE, respectively. However, to date, no prospective study was designed to compare these two minimally invasive approaches (MIE and RAE). The primary objective of this study is to compare the outcomes on survival, safety and efficacy, quality of life between RAE and MIE in the treatment for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).
机译:背景技术目前,可切除食管癌的手术方法主要有三种:开放式经胸食管切除术(OTE),常规微创食管切除术(MIE)和机器人辅助食管切除术(RAE)。先前的研究表明,与OTE相比,MIE或RAE的短期预后更好。但是,迄今为止,还没有设计前瞻性研究来比较这两种微创方法(MIE和RAE)。这项研究的主要目的是比较RAE和MIE在可切除的食管鳞状细胞癌(ESCC)治疗中的生存率,安全性和有效性,生活质量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号