首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>The Journal of Pharmacy Technology : jPT : Official Publication of the Association of Pharmacy Technicians >Variations of a Commonly Used Medication Adherence Assessment Scale: Do Changes in Scale Change Structure Results?
【2h】

Variations of a Commonly Used Medication Adherence Assessment Scale: Do Changes in Scale Change Structure Results?

机译:常用药物依从性评估量表的变化:量表的变化是否会改变结构?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background: Medication nonadherence is a major barrier to both patients and health care professionals when trying to manage medical conditions. An appropriate self-report adherence tool would be helpful in determining a patient’s medication adherence. >Objectives: To observe variations in scale scores based on modifications to an Original Adherence Scale, with the hypothesis that making modifications to the Original Adherence Scale will create variations in the percentage of adherent patients. >Methods: This cross-sectional study utilized mailed surveys to people identified in a prescription claims administrative dataset who had a pharmacy claim for at least 2 antihypertensive medications. One thousand people were equally divided and randomly placed in 1 of 4 groups: Original Adherence Scale Group, Time Reference Scale Group, 4-Point Likert-Type Scale Group, Multiple Medication Scales Group. Each scale underwent assessment of internal reliability using Cronbach’s α. Changes made to the Original 4-item scale included altering the time reference period from 3 months to 7 days, changing response options from Yes/No to a Likert-type scale, and incorporating multiple scales so that the respondent may report on up to 4 different options. >Results: There were 437 surveys completed appropriately, yielding a 46.4% response rate. The overall scale scores indicating perfect adherence was 51.8% for the 4-Point Likert-Type Scale Group, 66.5% for the Multiple Medication Scales Group, 68.8% for the Original Adherence Scale Group, and 78.9% for the Time Reference Scale Group. >Conclusion: When there are more selection options, a change in time reference, or more medications reported, the amount of adherent patients varied.
机译:>背景:药物不依从性是试图管理医疗条件时对患者和医疗保健专业人员的主要障碍。适当的自我报告依从性工具将有助于确定患者对药物的依从性。 >目标:观察基于原始坚持量表的修改而导致的量表分数的变化,并假设修改原始坚持量表将导致依从性患者百分比的变化。 >方法:这项横断面研究利用邮寄调查的形式,对处方药索赔管理数据集中确定的具有至少两种降压药的药理要求的人群进行了调查。将一千人平均分配并随机分为4组中的1组:原始坚持量表组,时间参考量表组,4点李克特型量表组,多种药物量表组。每个量表都使用Cronbach'sα进行了内部可靠性评估。对原始4项量表的更改包括将时间参考期限从3个月更改为7天,将回答选项从是/否更改为李克特式量表,并合并了多个量表,以便被调查者最多可以报告4不同的选择。 >结果:适当完成了437项调查,答复率为46.4%。表示完全依从的总体量表得分是4-点Likert型量表组,多重药物量表组的66.5%,原始坚持量表组的68.8%和时间参考量表组的78.9%。 >结论:当有更多选择选项,时间参考变更或报告了更多药物时,依从性患者的数量会有所不同。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号