首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>BMC International Health and Human Rights >HIV testing and care in Burkina Faso Kenya Malawi and Uganda: ethics on the ground
【2h】

HIV testing and care in Burkina Faso Kenya Malawi and Uganda: ethics on the ground

机译:布基纳法索肯尼亚马拉维和乌干达的艾滋病毒检测和护理:实地道德

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundThe ethical discourse about HIV testing has undergone a profound transformation in recent years. The greater availability of antiretroviral therapy (ART) has led to a global scaling up of HIV testing and counseling as a gateway to prevention, treatment and care. In response, critics raised important ethical questions, including: How do different testing policies and practices undermine or strengthen informed consent and medical confidentiality? How well do different modalities of testing provide benefits that outweigh risks of harm? To what degree do current testing policies and programs provide equitable access to HIV services? And finally, what lessons have been learned from the field about how to improve the delivery of HIV services to achieve public health objectives and protections for human rights? This article reviews the empirical evidence that has emerged to answer these questions, from four sub-Saharan African countries, namely: Burkina Faso, Kenya, Malawi and Uganda.
机译:背景技术近年来,有关艾滋病毒检测的道德论述发生了深刻的变化。抗逆转录病毒疗法(ART)的可用性越来越高,已导致在全球范围内扩大了HIV检测和咨询的范围,以此作为预防,治疗和护理的门户。对此,批评家提出了重要的道德问题,包括:不同的测试政策和做法如何破坏或加强知情同意书和医学保密性?不同的测试方式提供的收益超过危害风险的程度如何?当前的检测政策和计划在何种程度上可以公平地获得艾滋病服务?最后,从实地学到了什么教训,如何改善艾滋病服务的提供,以实现公共卫生目标和人权保护?本文回顾了来自四个撒哈拉以南非洲国家(布基纳法索,肯尼亚,马拉维和乌干达)回答这些问题的经验证据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号