首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>BMC Medical Research Methodology >Protocol for the development of a core outcome set for pelvic girdle pain including methods for measuring the outcomes: the PGP-COS study
【2h】

Protocol for the development of a core outcome set for pelvic girdle pain including methods for measuring the outcomes: the PGP-COS study

机译:制定骨盆带疼痛核心预后集的协议包括用于评估预后的方法:PGP-COS研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundPelvic Girdle Pain (PGP) is an important cause of disability and economic cost worldwide. There is a need for effective preventative and management strategies. Emerging studies measure a variety of outcomes rendering synthesis and translation to clinical practice difficult. A Core Outcome Set (COS) can address this problem by ensuring that data are relevant, useful and usable for making well-informed healthcare choices. The aim of this study is to develop a consensus-based PGP-COS, including agreement on methods (e.g. instruments) for measuring the construct outcomes in the COS for use in research and clinical practice. Furthermore, as there is uncertainty as to whether incorporating stakeholder interviews in addition to conducting a systematic review to determine an initial list of outcomes for the Delphi survey, or, whether using different rating scales in a Delphi survey impacts on the final COS, we propose to embed two methodological studies within the PGP-COS development process to address these questions.
机译:背景骨盆带痛(PGP)是导致世界范围内残疾和经济损失的重要原因。需要有效的预防和管理策略。新兴研究衡量了各种结果,使得合成和翻译到临床实践变得困难。核心结果集(COS)可以通过确保数据相关,有用且可用于做出明智的医疗保健选择来解决此问题。这项研究的目的是开发基于共识的PGP-COS,包括就用于测量COS中用于研究和临床实践的结构结果的方法(例如仪器)达成协议。此外,由于除了进行系统的审查以确定Delphi调查的初步结果清单之外,是否还需要进行利益相关方访谈,或者在Delphi调查中使用不同的评级量表对最终COS有影响方面,我们存在不确定性将两种方法学研究纳入PGP-COS开发过程中,以解决这些问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号